首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >012 PP: ?¢????THE OUTSIDERS FROM WITHIN?¢???? ?¢???? COPING AND ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES FOR SYSTEMS RESILIENCE IN THE PROCESS OF IMPLEMENTING POLITICAL DEVOLUTION WITHIN THE HEALTH SECTOR IN KENYA
【24h】

012 PP: ?¢????THE OUTSIDERS FROM WITHIN?¢???? ?¢???? COPING AND ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES FOR SYSTEMS RESILIENCE IN THE PROCESS OF IMPLEMENTING POLITICAL DEVOLUTION WITHIN THE HEALTH SECTOR IN KENYA

机译:012 PP:???? ?¢ ????肯尼亚卫生部门内实施政治权力转移过程中系统弹性的应对和适应策略

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Introduction Recent literature has underscored the value of health policy and systems research (HPSR) for systems strengthening. This discourse has highlighted the potential of HPSR as an intervention in itself, and the important role that researcher-policy maker collaborations can have as conduits for real-time research translation. Methods We set-up a health systems governance learning site in one of the 47 Kenyan counties, Kilifi, to analyse the implications of devolution on the health sector. This entailed being embedded in the contexts in which we carry out our research (county health departments, hospitals, primary health care facilities), and collaboratively working with health system actors at different levels to ?¢????learn?¢???? the system from within; to identify problems, formulate research questions and propose and document solutions. Results Pre-devolution results highlighted the autonomy that hospital managers had over the management of user fees, and the central role these fees played in addressing critical day-to-day recurrent needs at county hospitals. Under devolution, all revenues collected at the county level had to be pooled into one county revenue account, removing the autonomy that hospital managers had over user fees. This presented a challenge to hospitals, who were now unable to pay their routine bills, procure emergency supplies and other recurrent needs. We shared these observations to a broader stakeholder audience, which triggered policy dialogue and ultimately the development of county legislation to reinstate the autonomy that hospitals had over user fee collections. Conclusions This example highlights how the relationships established between researchers and policy maker can over time lead to acting together in real-time to address practical health system challenges.
机译:摘要简介最近的文献强调了卫生政策和系统研究(HPSR)对于加强系统的价值。本篇文章强调了HPSR本身作为一种干预手段的潜力,以及研究人员与政策制定者之间的合作可以充当实时研究翻译的重要角色。方法我们在肯尼亚的47个县之一基利菲(Kilifi)建立了一个卫生系统治理学习站点,以分析权力下放对卫生部门的影响。这需要嵌入到我们进行研究的环境中(县卫生部门,医院,初级卫生保健机构),并与不同级别的卫生系统参与者合作以进行学习。 ?内部系统识别问题,提出研究问题并提出和记录解决方案。结果权力下放前的结果强调了医院管理者在使用费管理方面的自主权,以及这些费用在满足县级医院关键的日常经常性需求方面发挥的核心作用。根据权力下放,所有在县一级收集的收入都必须汇总到一个县收入帐户中,从而消除了医院管理者在使用费上的自主权。这给医院带来了挑战,因为医院现在无法支付日常账单,采购紧急物资和其他经常性需求。我们将这些观点分享给了更多的利益相关者,从而引发了政策对话,并最终促进了县立法的制定,以恢复医院在使用费收取方面的自主权。结论该示例强调了研究人员与政策制定者之间建立的关系如何随着时间的流逝而导致实时协作以应对实际的卫生系统挑战。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BMJ Open》 |2017年第2期|共页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号