...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Fosfomycin versus meropenem in bacteraemic urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (FOREST): study protocol for an investigator-driven randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Fosfomycin versus meropenem in bacteraemic urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (FOREST): study protocol for an investigator-driven randomised controlled trial

机译:磷霉素与美罗培南在广谱β-内酰胺酶生产大肠杆菌(FOREST)引起的细菌性尿路感染中的应用:研究者驱动的随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction Finding therapeutic alternatives to carbapenems in infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) is imperative. Although fosfomycin was discovered more than 40?years ago, it was not investigated in accordance with current standards and so is not used in clinical practice except in desperate situations. It is one of the so-called neglected antibiotics of high potential interest for the future. Methods and analysis The main objective of this project is to demonstrate the clinical non-inferiority of intravenous fosfomycin with regard to meropenem for treating bacteraemic urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by ESBL-EC. This is a ‘real practice’ multicentre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial, designed to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy, and safety of intravenous fosfomycin (4?g/6?h) and meropenem (1?g/8?h) as targeted therapy for this infection; a change to oral therapy is permitted after 5?days in both arms, in accordance with predetermined options. The study design follows the latest recommendations for designing trials investigating new options for multidrug-resistant bacteria. Secondary objectives include the study of fosfomycin concentrations in plasma and the impact of both drugs on intestinal colonisation by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained from the Andalusian Coordinating Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Biomedical Research (Referral Ethics Committee), which obtained approval from the local ethics committees at all participating sites in Spain (22 sites). Data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Discussion This project is proposed as an initial step in the investigation of an orphan antimicrobial of low cost with high potential as a therapeutic alternative in common infections such as UTI in selected patients. These results may have a major impact on the use of antibiotics and the development of new projects with this drug, whether as monotherapy or combination therapy. Trial registration number NCT02142751. EudraCT no: 2013-002922-21. Protocol V.1.1 dated 14 March 2014.
机译:简介在产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的大肠杆菌(ESBL-EC)引起的感染中寻找碳青霉烯类的替代治疗方法势在必行。尽管磷霉素是在40多年前发现的,但并未按照当前的标准进行研究,因此除在绝望的情况下以外,并未在临床实践中使用。它是对未来有高度潜在兴趣的所谓被忽视的抗生素之一。方法和分析该项目的主要目的是证明美罗培南在治疗由ESBL-EC引起的细菌性尿路感染(UTI)方面,静脉注射磷霉素的临床疗效不逊于其他药物。这是一项“实际操作”的多中心,开放标签,III期随机对照试验,旨在比较静脉用磷霉素(4?g / 6?h)和美罗培南(1?g / 8)的临床和微生物学疗效以及安全性?h)作为这种感染的靶向治疗;根据预先确定的选项,允许两臂在5天后更换口服疗法。该研究设计遵循设计试验的最新建议,该试验研究耐多药细菌的新选择。次要目标包括研究血浆中磷霉素的浓度以及两种药物对多药耐药的革兰氏阴性菌对肠道菌落的影响。道德规范和传播道德规范获得了安达卢西亚生物医学研究机构协调委员会(IRB)的认可(推荐伦理委员会),该委员会获得了西班牙所有参与站点(22个站点)地方道德委员会的批准。数据将在国际会议上发表并发表在同行评审的期刊上。讨论该项目是研究低成本,高潜力的孤儿抗菌药物的第一步,可作为某些患者的常见感染(如UTI)的治疗选择。这些结果可能会对抗生素的使用以及使用这种药物的新项目的开发产生重大影响,无论是作为单一疗法还是联合疗法。试用注册号NCT02142751。 EudraCT号:2013-002922-21。 2014年3月14日的议定书V.1.1。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号