首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of VAsopressin versus Noradrenaline as Initial therapy in Septic sHock (VANISH)
【24h】

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of VAsopressin versus Noradrenaline as Initial therapy in Septic sHock (VANISH)

机译:VAsopressin与去甲肾上腺素作为败血症性休克初始治疗的随机对照试验的方案(VANISH)

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Vasopressin is an alternative vasopressor in the management of septic shock. It spares catecholamine use but whether it improves outcome remains uncertain. Current evidence suggests that it may be most effective if used early and possibly in conjunction with corticosteroids. This trial will compare vasopressin to noradrenaline as initial vasopressor in the management of adult septic shock and investigate whether there is an interaction of vasopressin with corticosteroids. Methods and analysis This is a multicentre, factorial (2×2), randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 412 patients will be recruited from multiple UK intensive care units and randomised to receive vasopressin (0–0.06?U/min) or noradrenaline (0–12?μg/min) as a continuous intravenous infusion as initial vasopressor therapy. If maximum infusion rates of this first study drug are reached, the patient will be treated with either hydrocortisone (initially 50?mg intravenous bolus six-hourly) or placebo, before additional open-label catecholamine vasopressors are prescribed. The primary outcome of the trial will be the difference in renal failure-free days between treatment groups. Secondary outcomes include need for renal replacement therapy, survival rates, other organ failures and resource utilisation. Ethics and dissemination The trial protocol and information sheets have received a favourable opinion from the Oxford A Research Ethics Committee (12/SC/0014). There is an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee and independent membership of the Trial Steering Committee including patient and public involvement. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings. Trial registration number: ISRCTN 20769191 and EudraCT 2011-005363-24.
机译:简介加压素是败血性休克治疗中的另一种加压素。它可以节省儿茶酚胺的使用,但尚不确定是否可以改善结果。目前的证据表明,如果提早使用并可能与皮质类固醇结合使用,它可能是最有效的。该试验将比较加压素和去甲肾上腺素作为成人败血性休克治疗中的初始加压素,并调查加压素与皮质类固醇之间是否存在相互作用。方法和分析这是一项多中心,析因(2×2),随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验。将从英国多个重症监护室招募412名患者,并随机接受血管加压素(0–0.06?U / min)或去甲肾上腺素(0–12?μg/ min)作为初始血管加压药的连续静脉输注。如果达到第一种研究药物的最大输注速率,则在开具额外的开放标签儿茶酚胺升压药之前,将用氢化可的松(最初为6小时,每次50mg静脉推注)或安慰剂治疗患者。该试验的主要结果将是治疗组之间无肾衰竭天数的差异。次要结果包括需要肾脏替代治疗,生存率,其他器官衰竭和资源利用。伦理与传播该试验方案和信息表已得到牛津A研究伦理委员会(12 / SC / 0014)的好评。有一个独立的数据监控和道德委员会,以及审判指导委员会的独立成员,包括患者和公众参与。该试验结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上,并在国家和国际科学会议上发表。试用注册号:ISRCTN 20769191和EudraCT 2011-005363-24。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号