...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Between compliance and resistance: exploring discourses on family planning in Community Health Committees in Mozambique
【24h】

Between compliance and resistance: exploring discourses on family planning in Community Health Committees in Mozambique

机译:在遵守与抵抗之间:在莫桑比克社区卫生委员会中探讨有关计划生育的话题

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives Although the Mozambican government has implemented a community-based approach to family planning (FP), little is known about the appropriateness of this process. We explore how members of Community Health Committees (CHCs) address and act regarding FP. Methods/settings An in-depth qualitative study of CHCs was conducted at two sites in Maputo province—Ndlavela and Boane—using focus group discussions (n=6), informal conversations (n=4) and observation. The analysis followed a phenomenological approach. Results CHCs in Ndlavela appeared to transfer more of the expected information than those in Boane. However, in the CHCs at both study sites, we found heterogeneity in CHCs’ perspectives leading to conflicting views among committee members (CMs). Arising issues included contraceptive type, target groups, the desirable number of children per family as well as the way FP was to be represented. Moreover, weak communication between CMs and health workers, and lack of payment for CMs’ activities influenced promotion of FP. Conclusions The two CHCs framed FP in different ways leading to inconsistent participation of CHC members in promoting FP. Policymakers should consider the diversity of discourses and aspirations of these committees when delivering information to them.
机译:目标尽管莫桑比克政府已经采取了以社区为基础的计划生育方法(FP),但对这一过程的适当性知之甚少。我们探索社区卫生委员会(CHC)成员如何应对计划生育并采取行动。方法/背景在焦点集中讨论(n = 6),非正式对话(n = 4)和观察的情况下,在马普托省的两个地点(恩德拉韦拉和博恩)进行了对CHC的深入定性研究。该分析遵循现象学方法。结果Ndlavela的CHC似乎比Boane的CHC传递了更多的预期信息。但是,在两个研究中心的CHC中,我们发现CHC的观点存在异质性,从而导致委员会成员(CM)之间的观点相互矛盾。提出的问题包括避孕类型,目标人群,每个家庭所需的儿童数量以及计划生育的代表方式。此外,CM和卫生工作者之间的沟通不畅,以及对CM活动的报酬不足影响了FP的晋升。结论两家社区卫生中心以不同的方式对计划生育进行了界定,导致社区卫生委员会成员在促进计划生育方面的参与不一致。决策者在向其提供信息时应考虑这些委员会的言论和期望的多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号