...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >The efficacy of activated protein C for the treatment of sepsis: incorporating observational evidence with a Bayesian approach
【24h】

The efficacy of activated protein C for the treatment of sepsis: incorporating observational evidence with a Bayesian approach

机译:活化蛋白C治疗败血症的功效:结合观察证据和贝叶斯方法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective The present study aimed to combine observational evidence with randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by using the Bayesian approach. Data sources Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ISI Web of Science, EMBASE and EBSCO were searched from inception to January 2014. Study eligibility RCTs and observational studies (OS) investigating the effectiveness of activated protein C (aPC) on mortality reduction were included for analysis. Participants Patients with sepsis. Intervention aPC. Synthesis methods Observational evidence was incorporated into the analysis by using power transformed priors in a Bayesian. Trial sequential analysis was performed to examine changes over time and whether further studies need to be conducted. Main results a total of 7 RCTs and 12 OS were included for the analysis. There was moderate heterogeneity among included RCTs (I2=48.6%, p=0.07). The pooled OR for mortality from RCTs was 1.00 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.19). In?OS, there was potential publication bias as indicated by the funnel plot and the pooled OR for mortality with the use of aPC was 0.67 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.72). The pooled effect sizes of RCTs were changed by using different power transform priors derived from observational evidence. When observational evidence was used at its ‘face value’, the treatment effect of aPC was statistically significant in reducing mortality. Conclusions while RCT evidence showed no beneficial effect of aPC on sepsis, observational evidence showed a significant treatment effect of aPC. By using power transform priors in Bayesian model, we explicitly demonstrated how RCT evidence could be changed by observational evidence. Trial registration number The protocol for the current study was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42014009562).
机译:目的本研究旨在通过贝叶斯方法将观察证据与随机对照试验(RCT)结合起来。数据源从开始到2014年1月,一直在搜索电子数据库,包括PubMed,Cochrane对照试验中央注册系统(CENTRAL),ISI Web of Science,EMBASE和EBSCO。研究资格RCT和观察性研究(OS)研究了活化蛋白C的有效性(aPC)关于降低死亡率的分析。参与者败血症患者。干预aPC。合成方法使用贝叶斯变换中的幂变换先验,将观察证据纳入分析。进行了试验顺序分析,以检查随时间的变化以及是否需要进行进一步的研究。主要结果总共包括7个RCT和12个OS进行了分析。在包括在内的RCT中有中等程度的异质性(I 2 = 48.6%,p = 0.07)。 RCT死亡率的合并OR为1.00(95%CI为0.84至1.19)。在InOS中,如漏斗图所示,存在潜在的出版偏倚,使用aPC的死亡率合并OR为0.67(95%CI为0.62至0.72)。通过使用来自观察证据的不同幂变换先验来更改RCT的合并效应大小。当以“面值”使用观察证据时,aPC的治疗效果在降低死亡率方面具有统计学意义。结论尽管RCT证据显示aPC对败血症无有益作用,但观察证据显示aPC有明显的治疗作用。通过在贝叶斯模型中使用幂变换先验,我们明确证明了如何通过观察证据来改变RCT证据。试验注册号当前研究的方案已在PROSPERO中注册(注册号:CRD42014009562)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号