...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >How big does the effect of an intervention have to be? Application of two novel methods to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of a fall prevention programme: a study protocol
【24h】

How big does the effect of an intervention have to be? Application of two novel methods to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of a fall prevention programme: a study protocol

机译:干预的效果必须有多大?应用两种新颖方法确定跌倒预防计划的最小价值:一项研究方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction This project concerns the identification of the smallest worthwhile effect (SWE) of exercise-based programmes to prevent falls in older people. The SWE is the smallest effect that justifies the costs, risks and inconveniences of an intervention and is used to inform the design and interpretation of systematic reviews and randomised clinical trials. Methods and analysis This study will comprise two different methodological approaches: the benefit-harm trade-off method and the discrete choice experiment to estimate the SWE of exercise interventions to prevent falls in older people. In the benefit-harm trade-off method, hypothetical scenarios with the benefits, costs, risks and inconveniences associated with the intervention will be presented to each participant. Then, assuming a treatment effect of certain magnitude, the participant will be asked if he or she would choose to have the intervention. The size of the hypothetical benefit will be varied up and down until it is possible to identify the SWE for which the participant would choose to have the intervention. In the discrete choice experiment, the same attributes (benefits, costs, risks and inconveniences) with varying levels will be presented as choice sets, and participants will be asked to choose between these choice sets. With this approach, we will determine the probability that a person will consider the effects of an intervention to be worthwhile, given the particular costs, risks and inconveniences. For each of the two approaches, participants will be interviewed in person and on different occasions. A subsample of the total cohort will participate in both interviews. Ethics and dissemination This project has received Ethics Approval from the University of Sydney Human Ethics Committee (Protocol number: 14404). Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations, seminars and peer-reviewed scientific journals.
机译:简介该项目涉及确定基于运动的计划的最小价值效应(SWE),以防止老年人跌倒。 SWE是证明干预措施的成本,风险和不便合理的最小作用,并用于指导系统评价和随机临床试验的设计和解释。方法与分析本研究将包括两种不同的方法学方法:利益-损害权衡方法和离散选择实验,以估计运动干预措施的SWE以防止老年人跌倒。在利益-损害权衡方法中,将向每个参与者展示与干预相关的利益,成本,风险和不便的假设情景。然后,假设某种程度的治疗效果,将询问参与者是否选择干预。假设收益的大小将上下变化,直到有可能确定参与者将选择对其进行干预的SWE。在离散选择实验中,具有不同级别的相同属性(收益,成本,风险和不便)将作为选择集呈现,并且要求参与者在这些选择集之间进行选择。通过这种方法,我们将确定在给定特定成本,风险和不便的情况下,一个人认为干预效果值得的可能性。对于这两种方法中的每一种,都将在不同的场合亲自采访参与者。整个队列的子样本将参加两次访谈。道德与传播该项目已获得悉尼大学人类道德委员会的道德批准(协议编号:14404)。研究结果将通过会议演讲,研讨会和同行评审的科学杂志进行传播。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号