首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Evaluation of the self-inflating bag-valve-mask and non-rebreather mask as preoxygenation devices in volunteers
【24h】

Evaluation of the self-inflating bag-valve-mask and non-rebreather mask as preoxygenation devices in volunteers

机译:对自充气袋阀门面罩和非循环呼吸面罩作为志愿者中的预充氧装置的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To evaluate and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of preoxygenation with the self-inflating bag-valve-mask (BVM) and non-rebreather mask (NRM) as are used before emergency anaesthesia. Design Device performance evaluation. Setting Experimental study. Participants 12 male and 12 female healthy volunteers (age range 24–47) with no history of clinically significant respiratory disease. Interventions End-expiration oxygen measurements (FEO2) after 3?min of preoxygenation with BVM (without mechanical assistance) and NRM devices. Mask pressures were measured and subjective difficulty of breathing was also assessed with a visual analogue score (VAS). Primary and secondary outcome measures The final FEO2 achieved was 58.0% (SD 7.3%) for the NRM compared to 53.1% (SD 13.4%) for the BVM (p=0.072). Preoxygenation was associated with small increases in FECO2 that were greater for the BVM (0.50%; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.52) than the NRM (0.29%; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.28); this difference was statistically significant (p=0.028). Both devices were well tolerated on VAS assessment of difficulty of breathing although this was higher for the BVM than the NRM (median VAS 1.85/10 compared to 1.1/10; p=0.041). Inspiratory and expiratory mask pressures were higher for the BVM. Conclusions In healthy volunteers, the NRM performs comparably to the BVM in terms of the degree of denitrogenation achieved although neither performed well. Although it was well tolerated, the BVM was subjectively more difficult to breathe through and was associated with greater mask pressures and a small increase in FECO2 consistent with hypoventilation or rebreathing. Our results suggest that preoxygenation with the NRM may be a preferable approach in spontaneously breathing patients.
机译:目的评估和比较在急诊麻醉前使用自充气袋气门面罩(BVM)和非循环呼吸面罩(NRM)进行预充氧的有效性和耐受性。设计设备性能评估。进行实验研究。参与者12名男性和12名女性健康志愿者(年龄在24-47岁之间),没有临床上显着的呼吸系统疾病史。干预BVM(无机械辅助)和NRM设备预充氧3分钟后,呼气末氧测量值(F E O 2 )。测量面罩的压力,并通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估主观呼吸困难。主要和次要指标NRM的最终F E O 2 达到了58.0%(SD 7.3%),而BVM达到了53.1%(SD 13.4%)( p = 0.072)。预氧化与F E CO 2 的小幅增加相关,BVM(0.50%; 95%CI 0.48至0.52)大于NRM(0.29%; 95) %CI 0.31至0.28);这种差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.028)。在VAS评估呼吸困难方面,两种设备均具有良好的耐受性,尽管BVM的呼吸耐受性高于NRM(VAS中位数为1.85 / 10,而NPM为1.1 / 10; p = 0.041)。 BVM的吸气和呼气面罩压力较高。结论在健康志愿者中,尽管脱氮效果不佳,但NRM的表现与BVM相当。尽管BVM具有良好的耐受性,但主观上呼吸困难,并且与面罩压力较大以及F E CO 2 的小幅升高相关,这与换气不足或重新呼吸有关。我们的结果表明,使用NRM预充氧可能是自发呼吸患者的首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号