首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Delivering the right information to the right person at the right time to facilitate deprescribing in hospital: a mixed methods multisite study to inform decision support design in Australia
【24h】

Delivering the right information to the right person at the right time to facilitate deprescribing in hospital: a mixed methods multisite study to inform decision support design in Australia

机译:在正确的时间向正确的人提供正确的信息,以促进医院开具处方:一项混合方法多站点研究,为澳大利亚的决策支持设计提供信息

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives To inform the design of electronic decision support (EDS) to facilitate deprescribing in hospitals we set out to (1) explore the current processes of in-hospital medicines review, deprescribing and communication of deprescribing decisions with the patient’s general practitioner (GP), (2) identify barriers to undertaking these tasks and (3) determine user preferences for EDS.Design Multimethod, multisite study comprising observations, semistructured interviews and focus groups.Setting General medicine, geriatric medicine and rehabilitation wards at six hospitals in two local health districts in Sydney, Australia and primary care practices in one primary healthcare district in Sydney, Australia.Participants 149 participants took part in observations, interviews and focus groups, including 69 hospital doctors, 13 nurses, 55 pharmacists and 12 GPs.Main outcome measures Observational data on who was involved in medicines review and deprescribing, when medicines review took place, and what artefacts (eg, forms) were used. Participants reported perceptions of medicines review, polypharmacy and deprescribing and preferences for EDS.Results Deprescribing, undertaken during medicines review, was typically performed by a junior doctor, following a decision to deprescribe by a senior doctor. Key barriers to deprescribing included a perception that deprescribing was not the responsibility of hospital doctors, a lack of confidence among junior doctors and pharmacists in broaching this topic with senior doctors and a lack of patient engagement in the deprescribing process. In designing EDS, the tools, likely to be used by junior doctors, pharmacists and nurses, should be available throughout the hospitalisation and should comprise non-interruptive evidence-based guidance on why and how to deprescribe.Conclusions Deprescribing decisions are complex and influenced by multiple factors. The implementation of EDS alone is unlikely to address all barriers identified. To achieve sustained improvements in monitoring of polypharmacy and subsequent deprescribing, a multifaceted intervention is needed.
机译:目的为了向电子决策支持(EDS)的设计提供信息,以促进医院开具处方,我们着手(1)探索当前医院内药物复审,处方开处方以及与患者的全科医生(GP)沟通的过程, (2)确定执行这些任务的障碍并(3)确定用户对EDS的偏爱;设计包括观察,半结构化访谈和焦点小组在内的多方法,多站点研究;在两个当地卫生区的六家医院设置普通医学,老年医学和康复病房主要结果指标观察数据在澳大利亚悉尼市和澳大利亚悉尼一个初级保健区的初级保健实践中,有149名参与者参加了观察,访谈和焦点小组讨论,其中包括69名医院医生,13名护士,55名药剂师和12名全科医生。关于谁参与了药品审查和开具处方,何时进行药品审查,以及使用了哪些人工制品(例如形式)。参与者报告了对药物审查,多元药房和处方药的看法以及对EDS的偏好。结果药物审查期间进行的处方药通常由初级医生执行,然后由高级医生决定不再处方。开处方的主要障碍包括:开处方不是医院医生的责任;初级医生和药剂师对与高级医生讨论这个话题缺乏信心;以及患者在开处方过程中缺乏参与。在设计EDS时,可能在整个住院期间都可以使用初级医生,药剂师和护士所使用的工具,并且应包括关于不推荐使用为什么以及如何取消使用处方的无间断的循证指南。结论拒绝使用处方的决定是复杂的,并且受到以下因素的影响多种因素。仅实施EDS不可能解决所有已确定的障碍。为了在监控多药房和随后停用处方药方面取得持续的进步,需要采取多方面的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号