...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries
【24h】

What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries

机译:欧洲女性对女性癌症风险和癌症筛查了解什么?在五个欧洲国家进行的跨部门在线干预调查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives Informed decisions about cancer screening require accurate knowledge regarding cancer risks and screening. This study investigates: (1) European women’s knowledge of their risk of developing breast, ovarian, cervical or endometrial cancer, (2) their knowledge about mammography screening and (3) whether an evidence-based leaflet improves their knowledge.Design Cross-sectional online intervention survey.Setting National samples from five European countries (Czech Republic, Germany, UK, Italy and Sweden)—drawn from the Harris Interactive and the Toluna panel, respectively, in January 2017—were queried on their knowledge of age-specific risks of developing breast, cervical, ovarian or endometrial cancer within the next 10 years and of mammography screening before and after intervention.Participants Of 3629 women (inclusion criteria: age 40–75 years) invited, 2092 responded and 1675 completed the survey (response rate: 61.4%).Intervention Evidence-based leaflet summarising information on age-adjusted female cancer risks, mammography and aspects of cancer prevention.Primary outcome measures Proportion of women (1) accurately estimating their risk of four female cancers, (2) holding correct assumptions of mammography screening and (3) changing their estimations and assumptions after exposure to leaflet.Findings Across countries, 59.2% (95% CI 56.8% to 61.6%) to 91.8% (95% CI 90.3% to 93.0%) overestimated their female cancer risks 7–33 fold (mediansacross?tumours: 50.0 to 200.0). 26.5% (95% CI 24.4% to 28.7%) were aware that mammography screening has both benefits and harms. Women who accurately estimated their breast cancer risk were less likely to believe that mammography prevents cancer (p0.001). After leaflet intervention, knowledge of cancer risks improved by 27.0 (95% CI 24.9 to 29.2) to 37.1 (95% CI 34.8 to 39.4) percentage points and of mammography by 23.0 (95% CI 21.0 to 25.1) percentage points.Conclusion A considerable number of women in five European countries may not possess the prerequisites for an informed choice on cancer screening. Evidence-based information in patient leaflets can improve this situation.
机译:目标有关癌症筛查的明智决策需要有关癌症风险和筛查的准确知识。这项研究调查了以下内容:(1)欧洲女性对罹患乳腺癌,卵巢癌,宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌的风险的了解;(2)对乳腺X线摄影筛查的了解;以及(3)循证传单是否可以提高她们的知识。在线干预调查。分别从哈里斯互动公司和托鲁纳小组分别于2017年1月抽取的五个欧洲国家(捷克共和国,德国,英国,意大利和瑞典)收集国家样本,询问他们对特定年龄风险的了解未来10年内发生的乳腺癌,宫颈癌,卵巢癌或子宫内膜癌的发生率以及干预前后的乳房X线照片筛查。参加研究的3629名妇女(纳入标准:40-75岁)中,有2092名得到了答复,并且1675名完成了调查(答复率:61.4%)。干预措施基于证据的传单总结了年龄调整后的女性癌症风险,乳腺钼靶和癌症预防方面的信息。主要结局指标妇女的比例(1)准确估计其患有四种女性癌症的风险;(2)坚持进行乳房X线照片筛查的正确假设;(3)接触传单后改变其估计和假设。各国的调查结果为59.2%(95%CI 56.8%)至61.6%)至91.8%(95%CI为90.3%至93.0%)高估了其女性癌症风险7-33倍(中位交叉肿瘤:50.0至200.0)。 26.5%(95%CI为24.4%至28.7%)意识到乳腺钼靶筛查既有益处也有危害。准确估计其乳腺癌风险的女性不太可能相信乳腺X线摄影可以预防癌症(p <0.001)。经过传单干预后,对癌症风险的了解提高了27.0(95%CI从24.9至29.2)增至37.1(95%CI从34.8至39.4)百分点,乳房X线照相术提高了23.0(95%CI从21.0至25.1)百分点。欧洲五个国家/地区的女性人数可能不具备进行癌症筛查的知情选择的前提条件。患者传单中的循证信息可以改善这种情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号