...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >88: MANAGER'S PERSONALITY TYPE: DOES IT MAKE DIFFERENCE IN THE APPLICATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE APPROACH
【24h】

88: MANAGER'S PERSONALITY TYPE: DOES IT MAKE DIFFERENCE IN THE APPLICATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE APPROACH

机译:88:经理的人格类型:在采用基于实证的实践方法时是否有所不同

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background and aims: Managers are responsible for their decisions and organizational performance. Evidence-based practice (EBP) can improve decision effectiveness and secure organization against potential risks. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between managers personality type and using evidence- based practice approach. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was done in 2015 among managers of Tehran teaching hospitals. Census method was used to sampling and all hospital managers (44 managers) were selected. Standard DISC personality test and researcher-designed questionnaire (about using EBP approach) were used for data collection. Data analyzes were performed through SPSS-V20 software by using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey statistical tests. Results: The response rate was 86.4 percent. The 81.6 percent of managers were men and mean age of all participates was 46.7 years. The 57.8 percent of managers had academic education in management. Findings showed that the portion of dominant, influential, steady and conscientious personality types were 36.4, 27.3, 13.6, and 22.7 percent, respectively. The mean of using EBP approach was 3.1 of five point scale. The results of One-Way ANOVA showed that the scores of EBP using were different based on personality types (p<0.05). The Tukey's results determined that the mentioned difference was related to conscientious personality type. Conclusion: Managers with conscientious personality type had used EBP approach more than others. Therefore, it can be suggested to conduct similar studies in larger samples and using the results of these studies in recruiting processes particularly for key jobs.
机译:摘要背景和目标:管理者应对其决策和组织绩效负责。循证实践(EBP)可以提高决策效率并确保组织免受潜在风险的影响。本研究旨在调查经理人格类型与基于证据的实践方法之间的关系。方法:这项描述性分析研究于2015年在德黑兰教学医院的管理人员中进行。使用人口普查方法进行抽样,并选择了所有医院经理(44名经理)。使用标准的DISC人格测试和研究人员设计的问卷(关于使用EBP方法)进行数据收集。使用单向方差分析和Tukey统计检验通过SPSS-V20软件进行数据分析。结果:回应率为86.4%。经理的比例为81.6%,其平均年龄为46.7岁。 57.8%的管理人员接受过管理方面的学术教育。调查结果显示,显性,有影响力,稳重和尽责的人格类型分别占36.4%,27.3%,13.6%和22.7%。使用EBP方法的平均值为5分制的3.1分。单向方差分析的结果表明,使用EBP的得分因人格类型而异(p <0.05)。图基(Tukey)的结果确定,提到的差异与尽责的人格类型有关。结论:具有尽责型人格的经理比其他人更多地使用了EBP方法。因此,建议在较大的样本中进行类似的研究,并在招聘过程中尤其是关键职位的招聘过程中使用这些研究的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BMJ Open》 |2017年第1期|共页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号