...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >A randomised comparison of Conventional versus Intentional straTegy in patients with high Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion: rationale and design of the CIT-RESOLVE trial
【24h】

A randomised comparison of Conventional versus Intentional straTegy in patients with high Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion: rationale and design of the CIT-RESOLVE trial

机译:冠状动脉分叉介入术中侧支阻塞高风险预测患者的常规与有意策略的随机比较:CIT-RESOLVE试验的原理和设计

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Introduction The intentional strategy (aggressive side branch (SB) protection strategy: elective two-stent strategy or jailed balloon technique) is thought to be associated with lower SB occlusion rate than conventional strategy (provisional two-
机译:摘要简介人们认为,故意策略(侵略性侧支(SB)保护策略:选择性两支架策略或监禁气球技术)与SB闭塞率相比比常规策略(临时两策略-

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号