...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on screening for cardiovascular disease risk in a primary prevention population: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on screening for cardiovascular disease risk in a primary prevention population: a cross-sectional study

机译:社会经济剥夺对一级预防人群筛查心血管疾病风险的影响:一项横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives Investigate the association between socioeconomic deprivation and completeness of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor recording in primary care, uptake of screening in people with incomplete risk factor recording and with actual CVD risk within the screened subgroup. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Nine UK general practices. Participants 7987 people aged 50–74?years with no CVD diagnosis. Methods CVD risk was estimated using the Framingham equation from data extracted from primary care electronic health records. Where there was insufficient information to calculate risk, patients were invited to attend a screening assessment. Analysis Proportion of patients for whom clinical data were sufficiently complete to enable CVD risk to be calculated; proportion of patients invited to screening who attended; proportion of patients who attended screening whose 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event was high (20%). For each outcome, a set of logistic regression models were run. Crude and adjusted ORs were estimated for person-level deprivation, age, gender and smoking status. We included practice-level deprivation as a continuous variable and practice as a random effect to account for clustering. Results People who had lower Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) scores (less deprived) had significantly worse routine CVD risk factor recording (adjusted OR 0.97 (0.95 to 1.00) per IMD decile; p=0.042). Screening attendance was poorer in those with more deprivation (adjusted OR 0.89 (0.86 to 0.91) per IMD decile; p0.001). Among those who attended screening, the most deprived were more likely to have CVD risk 20% (OR 1.09 (1.03 to 1.15) per IMD decile; p=0.004). Conclusions Our data suggest that those who had the most to gain from screening were least likely to attend, potentially exacerbating existing health inequalities. Future research should focus on tailoring the delivery of CVD screening to ensure engagement of socioeconomically deprived groups.
机译:目的调查社会经济剥夺与初级保健中心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素记录的完整性,风险因素记录不完整以及筛查亚组中实际CVD风险的人接受筛查之间的关系。设计横断面研究。制定九项英国一般惯例。参与者7987岁,年龄在50-74岁,没有CVD诊断。方法使用Framingham方程根据从初级保健电子健康记录中提取的数据估算CVD风险。如果没有足够的信息来计算风险,则邀请患者参加筛查评估。分析临床数据足够完整以能够计算出CVD风险的患者比例;被邀请参加筛查的患者比例;接受筛查的10年心血管事件风险高(> 20%)的患者比例。对于每个结果,运行一组逻辑回归模型。估计了粗略和调整后的OR,用于人员水平的剥夺,年龄,性别和吸烟状况。我们将练习级别的剥夺作为连续变量,而练习则作为随机效应来考虑聚类。结果多重剥夺指数(IMD)得分较低(较少剥夺)的人的常规CVD危险因素记录明显较差(每IMD十分位数校正OR值为0.97(0.95至1.00); p = 0.042)。在那些被剥夺更多的人群中,筛查出席率较差(调整后的每个IMD十分位数的校正值为OR 0.89(0.86至0.91); p <0.001)。在参加筛查的人群中,最贫困的人群更有可能发生CVD风险> 20%(每IMD十分位数为OR 1.09(1.03至1.15); p = 0.004)。结论我们的数据表明,从筛查中受益最大的人参加筛查的可能性最小,从而可能加剧现有的健康不平等现象。未来的研究应侧重于定制CVD筛查的交付,以确保社会经济贫困群体的参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号