...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review
【24h】

Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review

机译:患者在线访问其电子健康记录和链接的在线服务:系统的解释性评论

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives To investigate the effect of providing patients online access to their electronic health record (EHR) and linked transactional services on the provision, quality and safety of healthcare. The objectives are also to identify and understand: barriers and facilitators for providing online access to their records and services for primary care workers; and their association with organisational/IT system issues. Setting Primary care. Participants A total of 143 studies were included. 17 were experimental in design and subject to risk of bias assessment, which is reported in a separate paper. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria have also been published elsewhere in the protocol. Primary and secondary outcome measures Our primary outcome measure was change in quality or safety as a result of implementation or utilisation of online records/transactional services. Results No studies reported changes in health outcomes; though eight detected medication errors and seven reported improved uptake of preventative care. Professional concerns over privacy were reported in 14 studies. 18 studies reported concern over potential increased workload; with some showing an increase workload in email or online messaging; telephone contact remaining unchanged, and face-to face contact staying the same or falling. Owing to heterogeneity in reporting overall workload change was hard to predict. 10 studies reported how online access offered convenience, primarily for more advantaged patients, who were largely highly satisfied with the process when clinician responses were prompt. Conclusions Patient online access and services offer increased convenience and satisfaction. However, professionals were concerned about impact on workload and risk to privacy. Studies correcting medication errors may improve patient safety. There may need to be a redesign of the business process to engage health professionals in online access and of the EHR to make it friendlier and provide equity of access to a wider group of patients. A1. Systematic review registration number PROSPERO CRD42012003091.
机译:目的研究为患者提供在线访问其电子健康记录(EHR)和相关交易服务对医疗保健的提供,质量和安全性的影响。目标还在于确定和理解:为初级保健工作者提供在线访问其记录和服务的障碍和促进者;以及它们与组织/ IT系统问题的关联。设置初级保健。参加者共有143项研究。 17项是在设计上处于实验性阶段,并存在偏见评估风险,这在另一篇论文中进行了报道。详细的纳入和排除标准也已在方案的其他地方发布。主要和次要成果衡量指标我们的主要成果衡量指标是由于在线记录/交易服务的实施或使用而导致的质量或安全性变化。结果尚无研究报告健康状况的改变。尽管有8个发现了用药错误,并且有7个报告了预防保健的采用率有所提高。 14项研究报告了专业人士对隐私的关注。 18项研究报告担心工作量可能增加;有些显示电子邮件或在线消息的工作量增加;电话联系人保持不变,并且面对面的联系人保持不变或下降。由于报告工作负载总体变化的异质性,因此难以预测。 10项研究报告了在线访问如何为主要是优势较大的患者提供便利,这些患者对临床医生迅速做出反应的过程非常满意。结论患者的在线访问和服务提供了更多的便利和满意度。但是,专业人士担心对工作量的影响和隐私风险。纠正用药错误的研究可以提高患者安全性。可能需要对业务流程进行重新设计,以使医疗保健专业人员参与在线访问,而电子病历系统应使其更加友好,并为更多的患者提供公平的访问机会。 A1。系统评价注册号为PROSPERO CRD42012003091。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号