...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer
【24h】

A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer

机译:关于Lactate Plus分析仪有效性和可靠性的方法比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives The aims of this study were to: (1) determine the validity and reliability of the Nova Biomedical Lactate Plus portable analyzer, and quantify any fixed or proportional bias; (2) determine the effect of any bias on the determination of the lactate threshold and (3) determine the effect that blood sampling methods have on validity and reliability. Design In this method comparison study we compared blood lactate concentration measured using the Lactate Plus portable analyzer to lactate concentration measured by a reference analyzer, the YSI 2300. Setting University campus in the USA. Participants Fifteen active men and women performed a discontinuous graded exercise test to volitional exhaustion on a motorised treadmill. Blood samples were taken via finger prick and collected in microcapillary tubes for analysis by the reference instrument at the end of each stage. Duplicate samples for the portable analyzer were either taken directly from the finger or from the micro capillary tubes. Primary outcome measurements Ordinary least products regressions were used to assess validity, reliability and bias in the portable analyzer. Lactate threshold was determined by visual inspection. Results Though measurements from both instruments were correlated (r=0.91), the differences between instruments had large variability (SD=1.45?mM/l) when blood was sampled directly from finger. This variability was reduced by ~95% when both instruments measured blood collected in the capillary tubes. As the proportional and fixed bias between instruments was small, there was no difference in estimates of the lactate threshold between instruments. Reliability for the portable instrument was strong (r=0.99, p0.05) with no proportional bias (slope=1.02) and small fixed bias (?0.19?mM/l). Conclusions The Lactate Plus analyzer provides accurate and reproducible measurements of blood lactate concentration that can be used to estimate workloads corresponding to blood lactate transitions or any absolute lactate concentrations.
机译:目的本研究的目的是:(1)确定Nova Biomedical Lactate Plus便携式分析仪的有效性和可靠性,并量化任何固定或比例偏差; (2)确定任何偏倚对确定乳酸阈值的影响;(3)确定采血方法对有效性和可靠性的影响。设计在此方法比较研究中,我们将使用Lactate Plus便携式分析仪测得的血乳酸浓度与参考分析仪YSI 2300测得的乳酸浓度进行了比较。美国设置大学校园。参与者15名活跃的男性和女性在电动跑步机上进行了不连续的分级运动测试,以检查其疲劳程度。在每个阶段结束时,通过手指刺取血样并收集在微毛细管中,以供参考仪器进行分析。直接从手指或微型毛细管中取​​出便携式分析仪的重复样品。主要结果测量普通最小产品回归用于评估便携式分析仪的有效性,可靠性和偏倚。通过目测确定乳酸阈值。结果尽管两种仪器的测量值均相关(r = 0.91),但直接从手指采血时,两种仪器之间的差异具有较大的差异(SD = 1.45?mM / l)。当两种仪器都测量毛细管中采集的血液时,这种可变性降低了约95%。由于仪器之间的比例偏差和固定偏差很小,因此仪器之间的乳酸阈值估算值没有差异。便携式仪器的可靠性强(r = 0.99,p <0.05),没有比例偏差(斜率= 1.02),固定偏差小(?0.19?mM / l)。结论Lactate Plus分析仪可准确,可重复地测量血乳酸浓度,可用于估算与血乳酸转变或任何绝对乳酸浓度相对应的工作量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号