...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints
【24h】

The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints

机译:中风后投诉(COMPAS)研究:一项针对中风后主观认知障碍的荷兰队列研究的方案

获取原文

摘要

Background Although many studies have assessed poststroke objective cognitive impairment, only a few have evaluated patients’ subjective cognitive complaints (SCC). Although these SCC are found to be common in the early and chronic phases after stroke, knowledge about their risk factors, course over time, differences with healthy controls and their diagnostic relevance is limited. The aim of the COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study is therefore to determine the possible risk factors, prognosis, time course and predictive value of SCC in the first 2?years after stroke. Methods and design A prospective cohort study is conducted in which patients are compared to non-stroke controls at 3, 6, 12 and 24?months after stroke. Approximately 300 patients are recruited from the stroke units of three hospitals in the Netherlands, while 300 controls are sought among the relatives (spouses excluded) and social networks of participants. A wide range of subjective and objective variables is assessed in both groups using interviews, questionnaires and neuropsychological assessment. The primary outcomes include SCC and objective cognitive impairment, whereas secondary outcomes are quality of life, subjective recovery and daily life functioning. Ethics and dissemination The study is being carried out in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. The protocol has been approved by the medical ethics committees of the participating centres and all participants give written informed consent. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to the medical society and general public. Discussion The COMPAS study is the first to systematically evaluate poststroke SCC in a prospective longitudinal design, taking a wide range of subjective and objective variables into account. The results obtained can be used to accurately inform patients and their families, as well as to develop patient-tailored intervention programmes to ultimately improve stroke patient care.
机译:背景技术尽管许多研究评估了卒中后的客观认知障碍,但只有少数研究评估了患者的主观认知障碍(SCC)。尽管发现这些SCC在中风后的早期和慢性阶段很常见,但有关其危险因素,随着时间的流逝,与健康对照的差异及其诊断相关性的知识有限。因此,中风后投诉(COMPAS)研究的目的是确定中风后前2年内SCC的可能危险因素,预后,时程和预测价值。方法和设计进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,在中风后3、6、12和24个月将患者与非中风对照组进行比较。从荷兰三家医院的卒中部门招募了大约300名患者,而在亲戚(不包括配偶)和参与者的社交网络中寻求300名对照。两组均使用访谈,问卷调查和神经心理学评估来评估广泛的主观和客观变量。主要结果包括SCC和客观认知障碍,而次要结果是生活质量,主观恢复和日常生活功能。伦理与传播这项研究是根据《赫尔辛基宣言》和《涉及人类受试者的医学研究法》进行的。该方案已得到参加中心的医学伦理委员会的批准,所有参加者均应签署知情同意书。研究结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上,并分发给医学界和公众。讨论COMPAS研究是第一个在前瞻性纵向设计中系统评估卒中后SCC的研究,该研究考虑了广泛的主观和客观变量。获得的结果可用于准确告知患者及其家人,以及制定针对患者的干预计划以最终改善中风患者的护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号