首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science >Evaluation of dynamic hip screw plate v/s proximal femoral nail for unstable inter-trochanteric fracture femur
【24h】

Evaluation of dynamic hip screw plate v/s proximal femoral nail for unstable inter-trochanteric fracture femur

机译:动力髋螺钉钢板v / s股骨近端钉治疗不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Intertrochantric fracture is most common fracture around hip joint in elderly patients. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) plate is gold standard treatment for stable Intertronchantric fracture but it has its own complication in unstable intertronchantric fracture. So newer implant was introduced a??Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN)a?? but it has its own complication. We studied 100 cases of unstable intertrochantric fracture to know which implant is better and was clinically assessed by Kyles criteria. Aims and objectives: To compare the short term result in DHS and PFN in all type of IT fracture and to set guidelines for managements of these fracture Methodology: This was Prospective randomized study comprised of unstable Fracture Intertronchantric treated by DHS and PFN. The cases were selected by envelop method for fixation unstable IT Fracture. The series consist of 100 cases were divided into 2 groups of patient treated by DHS and PFN . These cases where followed up for 6 months. Fracture stability was assessed by according to EVANS classification. Results: The mean time needed for the two procedures was 56.6 minutes (range 45-65 min) in Group A (DHS) and 40.8 minutes (range 35-51 min) in Group B (PFN). The period of hospitalization in Group A (DHS) was 9-12 days mean of days while in Group B (PFN) was 5-7 days with mean of days. Conclusion: Any modality of treatment done with proper expertise maintaining ideal surgical steps and principle, PFN carries slightly better result than DHS but which was not statically significant.
机译:背景:转子间骨折是老年患者最常见的髋关节周围骨折。动力髋螺钉(DHS)板是稳定的转子间骨折的金标准治疗方法,但在不稳定的转子间骨折中有其自身的并发症。因此,较新的植入物被引入了“近端股骨指甲”(PFN)a?但它有其自身的复杂性。我们研究了100例不稳定的转子间骨折病例,以了解哪种植入物更好,并通过Kyles标准进行了临床评估。目的和目的:比较DHS和PFN在所有类型的IT骨折中的短期结果,并为这些骨折的治疗制定指导方针。方法:这是一项前瞻性随机研究,包括由DHS和PFN治疗的不稳定的中间隔肌。采用包膜方法选择固定不稳定IT骨折的病例。该系列由100例病例分为2组,用DHS和PFN治疗。这些病例随访了6个月。根据EVANS分类评估骨折稳定性。结果:这两个步骤所需的平均时间在A组(DHS)中为56.6分钟(范围45-65分钟),在B组(PFN)中为40.8分钟(范围35-51分钟)。 A组(DHS)的住院时间为9-12天,平均数天,而B组(PFN)的住院时间为5-7天,平均天数。结论:任何具有适当专业知识的治疗方式均能维持理想的手术步骤和原则,PFN的效果比DHS略好,但在静态上并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号