首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science >Effect of Surface Finishing Methods and Corrosion on Surface Elemental Composition and Roughness of Dental Ceramics
【24h】

Effect of Surface Finishing Methods and Corrosion on Surface Elemental Composition and Roughness of Dental Ceramics

机译:表面处理方法和腐蚀对牙科陶瓷表面元素组成和粗糙度的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of surface finishing methods and chemical corrosion on surface elemental composition and roughness of ceramic materials. Material and Methods: 20 ceramic disks were fabricated from A1 shade of Empress, Zirkonzahn, Noritake Cerabien ZR, Finesse, Vita VM7 and divided into 2 groups of autoglaze and polishing(n=10). The surface roughness (Ra) and surface elemental analyses were evaluated before and after in vitro corrosion (pH 4.5–pH 7–pH 9 in water at 37°C ± 2°C for 18 hours and at pH 2.4 in 4% acetic acid at 80°C ± 2°C for 18 hours). The data were statistically analyzed by Univariate Analysis of Variance and Bonferroni Test. Multiple comparisons of Ra values between autoglaze and polishing groups for each brand of ceramic were computed by T-Test. Results: Analyses showed that the surface was dominated by Na, Al, Si. Glazed ceramics showed less ion change than polished ceramics at high intensity corrosion. No significant difference was found between Ra values of ceramics for both surface finishing methods, except Empress, a glass ceramic. Conclusion: The surface compositions of ceramics were found to differ according to type and brand of ceramic. Surface elemental composition did not make a difference on surface roughness or surface finishing technique. On the other hand surface elemental composition changes after chemical corrosion giving a sign of dissolution of ceramics.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较表面处理方法和化学腐蚀对陶瓷材料的表面元素组成和粗糙度的影响。材料和方法:用Empress,Zirkonzahn,Noritake Cerabien ZR,Finesse,Vita VM7的A1阴影制成20个陶瓷盘,分为2组,分别进行自动上釉和抛光(n = 10)。在体外腐蚀之前和之后(在37°C±2°C的水中于pH为4.5 – pH 7–pH 9的条件下腐蚀18小时,在pH为2.4的4%乙酸中)进行评估,以评估表面粗糙度(Ra)和表面元素分析。 80°C±2°C持续18小时)。数据通过方差单变量分析和Bonferroni检验进行统计分析。通过T-Test计算出每种品牌陶瓷在自动釉和抛光组之间的Ra值的多次比较。结果:分析表明,该表面以Na,Al,Si为主。在高强度腐蚀下,釉面陶瓷的离子变化小于抛光陶瓷。除Empress(玻璃陶瓷)外,两种表面处理方法的陶瓷Ra值均无显着差异。结论:发现陶瓷的表面组成根据陶瓷的类型和品牌而不同。表面元素组成对表面粗糙度或表面处理技术没有影响。另一方面,化学腐蚀后表面元素组成发生变化,从而显示出陶瓷溶解的迹象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号