首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >The Advantages and Disadvantages of Online and Blended Therapy: Survey Study Amongst Licensed Psychotherapists in Austria
【24h】

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Online and Blended Therapy: Survey Study Amongst Licensed Psychotherapists in Austria

机译:在线和混合疗法的优缺点:奥地利持牌心理治疗师的调查研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundWeb-based and blended (face-to-face plus Web-based) interventions for mental health disorders are gaining significance. However, many licensed psychotherapists still have guarded attitudes toward computer-assisted therapy, hindering dissemination efforts.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to provide a therapist-oriented evaluation of Web-based and blended therapies and identify commonalities and differences in attitudes toward both formats. Furthermore, it aimed to test the impact of an information clip on expressed attitudes.MethodsIn total, 95 Austrian psychotherapists were contacted and surveyed via their listed occupational email address. An 8-minute information video was shown to half of the therapists before 19 advantages and 13 disadvantages had to be rated on a 6-point Likert scale.ResultsThe sample resembled all assessed properties of Austrian psychotherapists (age, theoretical orientation, and region). Therapists did not hold a uniform overall preference. Instead, perceived advantages of both interventions were rated as neutral ( t _(94)=1.89, P =.06; d =0.11), whereas Web-based interventions were associated with more disadvantages and risks ( t _(94)=9.86, P <.001; d =0.81). The information clip did not excerpt any detectable effect on therapists’ attitudes ( r _(95)=?.109, P =.30). The application of modern technologies in the own therapeutic practice and cognitive behavioral orientation were positively related to the given ratings.ConclusionsThis study is the first to directly compare therapists’ attitudes toward Web-based and blended therapies. Positive attitudes play a pivotal role in the dissemination of new technologies, but unexperienced therapists seem to lack knowledge on how to benefit from technology-aided treatments. To speed up implementation, these aspects need to be addressed in the development of new interventions. Furthermore, the preference of blended treatments over Web-based interventions seems to relate to avoidance of risks. Although this study is likely to represent therapists’ attitudes in countries with less advanced electronic health services, therapists’ attitudes in more advanced countries might present differently.
机译:背景基于Web的和混合的(面对面加基于Web的)精神健康障碍干预措施正变得越来越重要。但是,许多持牌心理治疗师仍然对计算机辅助治疗持谨慎态度,从而阻碍了传播工作。目的本研究的目的是对基于Web的混合疗法进行以治疗师为导向的评估,并确定两种格式的共性和差异。此外,它还旨在测试信息夹对表达的态度的影响。方法总共通过其列出的职业电子邮件地址与95名奥地利心理治疗师进行了联系和调查。向一半的治疗师展示了一个8分钟的信息视频,然后以6点Likert量表对19个优点和13个缺点进行了评分。结果该样本类似于奥地利心理治疗师的所有评估属性(年龄,理论取向和地区)。治疗师并没有统一的总体偏爱。取而代之的是,两种干预措施的感知优势均被评为中立(t _(94)= 1.89,P = .06; d = 0.11),而基于Web的干预措施则带来了更多的不利因素和风险(t _(94)= 9.86)。 ,P <.001; d = 0.81)。该信息片段并未对治疗师的态度产生任何可检测到的影响(r _(95)= ?. 109,P = .30)。现代技术在自身治疗实践中的应用和认知行为取向与给定的评级呈正相关。结论本研究是第一个直接比较治疗师对基于Web和混合疗法的态度的研究。积极态度在新技术的传播中起着举足轻重的作用,但是没有经验的治疗师似乎缺乏如何从技术辅助治疗中受益的知识。为了加快实施,在开发新干预措施时必须解决这些方面。此外,混合治疗优于基于Web的干预措施似乎与规避风险有关。尽管这项研究可能代表了在电子医疗服务水平较低的国家中治疗师的态度,但在较先进的国家中治疗师的态度可能有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号