首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education >Developing a Recursive Evaluation Plan of a Complex Interprofessional Healthcare Education Initiative
【24h】

Developing a Recursive Evaluation Plan of a Complex Interprofessional Healthcare Education Initiative

机译:制定复杂的跨专业医疗保健教育计划的递归评估计划

获取原文
           

摘要

0 0 1 124 746 SHRP, Rutgers 62 17 853 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE Background: A university interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional practice (IPP) initiative is a complex undertaking: incorporating multiple system levels (administration, faculty, students, patients), integrating many theoretical perspectives, and coordinating a host of individual IPE research projects. Guidance for evaluating such an IPE initiative is lacking. Methods and Findings: We describe five key challenges to evaluating the effectiveness of such an initiative, and the processes and tools we have developed to meet those challenges. We draw from recent developments in evaluation science to theoretically ground our description. Additionally, we share concrete tools we have developed in the process. By tacking between theoretical and concrete aspects of our efforts, we hope to both provide ideas for other IPE initiatives, as well as provide a basis for future research comparing cases (complex university IPE initiatives). Conclusions: While all complex IPE university initiatives are unique, we suspect that they share many common evaluation challenges. By framing these common practical challenges as common theoretical challenges, we seek to offer a description of our concrete case as well as a basis for future comparison of similar initiatives.
机译:0 0 1 124 746 SHRP,罗格斯州62 17 853 14.0正常0假假否EN-US JA X-NONE背景:大学跨专业教育(IPE)和跨专业实践(IPP)计划是一项复杂的工作:合并多个系统级别(行政,教职,学生,患者),整合了许多理论观点,并协调了许多独立的IPE研究项目。缺乏评估此类IPE计划的指南。方法和发现:我们描述了评估该计划有效性的五个主要挑战,以及为应对这些挑战而开发的流程和工具。我们从评估科学的最新发展中汲取理论依据。此外,我们共享在此过程中开发的具体工具。通过在我们的工作的理论和具体方面之间打交道,我们希望为其他IPE倡议提供想法,并为将来的案例比较研究提供基础(复杂的大学IPE倡议)。结论:尽管所有复杂的IPE大学计划都是独特的,但我们怀疑它们面临许多共同的评估挑战。通过将这些常见的实际挑战称为常见的理论挑战,我们试图提供对我们具体案例的描述,并为将来对类似倡议进行比较提供依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号