首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Dentistry >Treatment time with self-ligating orthodontic brackets: a literature review
【24h】

Treatment time with self-ligating orthodontic brackets: a literature review

机译:自结扎正畸托槽的治疗时间:文献综述

获取原文
       

摘要

AIM: The aim of this study was carry out a literature review on the self-ligating brackets (SLB), identifying publications which evaluated the treatment time with these systems comparing them to the conventional brackets (CB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following indexing bases were researched: Medline (Medicine online – International Literature on Health Sciences), LILACS (Latin-American and Caribbean Literature on Health Science), IBECS (Spanish Bibliographic on Health Sciences), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) and Cochrane Library, available on the virtual librarian web site on Health of the Medicine Regional Library – BIREME (www.bireme.br). The following describers were researched: orthodontic brackets and self-ligating brackets and its correspondents in Spanish and English languages. In this study were covered the scientific researches published in the last ten years, available on their complete form. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the treatment time seems not showing clinical significant differences when compared the SLB and CB systems, and that researches as control case studies and randomized clinical trials, with rigorous methodology, should be developed to accurate investigation of concepts and results which involve the matter.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是对自结扎支架(SLB)进行文献综述,确定评估这些系统与传统支架(CB)相比治疗时间的出版物。材料和方法:研究了以下索引基础:Medline(在线医学–国际健康科学文献),LILACS(拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献),IBECS(西班牙健康科学书目),SciELO(科学电子图书馆)在线)和Cochrane图书馆,可在BHealth的医学健康区域图书馆的虚拟图书馆员网站上找到(www.bireme.br)。研究了以下描述者:正畸托槽和自结托托槽及其对应的西班牙语和英语语言。在这项研究中,涵盖了过去十年中发表的科学研究的完整形式。结论:结论是,与SLB和CB系统相比,治疗时间似乎未显示出临床显着差异,并且应开展严谨的方法作为对照案例研究和随机临床试验研究,以准确调查概念和结果,涉及此事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号