首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Intelligence >John Carroll’s Views on Intelligence: Bi-Factor vs. Higher-Order Models
【24h】

John Carroll’s Views on Intelligence: Bi-Factor vs. Higher-Order Models

机译:约翰·卡罗尔(John Carroll)关于情报的观点:双因素模型与高阶模型

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The development of factor models is inextricably tied to the history of intelligence research. One of the most commonly-cited scholars in the field is John Carroll, whose three-stratum theory of cognitive ability has been one of the most influential models of cognitive ability in the past 20 years. Nonetheless, there is disagreement about how Carroll conceptualized the factors in his model. Some argue that his model is best represented through a higher-order model, while others argue that a bi-factor model is a better representation. Carroll was explicit about what he perceived the best way to represent his model, but his writings are not always easy to understand. In this article, I clarify his position by first describing the details and implications of bi-factor and higher-order models then show that Carroll’s published views are better represented by a bi-factor model.
机译:因素模型的发展与情报研究的历史密不可分。约翰·卡洛尔(John Carroll)是该领域最常被引用的学者之一,他的三层认知能力理论在过去20年中一直是最有影响力的认知能力模型之一。尽管如此,关于卡洛尔如何概念化他模型中的因素仍存在分歧。一些人认为他的模型最好通过高阶模型来表示,而另一些人则认为双因素模型是更好的表示。卡洛尔(Carroll)明确表示自己认为是代表模型的最佳方法,但他的著作并不总是那么容易理解。在本文中,我首先通过描述双因素和高阶模型的细节和含义来阐明他的立场,然后通过双因素模型更好地表示卡罗尔发表的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号