首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Physics/Association of Medical Physicists of India >Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
【24h】

Evaluation and Performance of ArcCheck and Film using Gamma Criteria in Pre-treatment Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

机译:立体定向消融放疗的预处理质量保证中使用伽玛标准对ArcCheck和胶片的评估和性能

获取原文
       

摘要

Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the use of ArcCHECK (AC) as an alternative method to replace film dosimetry for pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatment plans. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients with a varied diagnosis of lung, spine, sacrum, sternum, ribs, scapula, and femur undergoing SABR were selected for this study. Pre-treatment QA was performed for all the patients using ionization chamber and film dosimetry. Measurements were also carried out on an AC phantom. The planned and measured doses from the AC device and EBT3 films were compared using four different gamma criteria: 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm, 3%/1 mm, and 3%/3 mm. Results: The mean gamma passing rates at 3%/3 mm for all non-spine SABR cases were 98.79 ± 0.96 and 99.27 ± 1.03 with AC and films, respectively. The mean passing rates at 3%/2 mm for AC and films were 98.76 ± 0.42 and 99.43 ± 0.27 respectively for spine VMAT SABR, and 87.15 ± 2.45 and 99.79 ± 0.14 respectively for spine IMRT SABR. In the case of spine tumors, the gamma criterion was tightened due to the proximity of spinal cord to the planning target volume. Our results show that AC provides good results for all VMAT SABR plans. Conclusion: The AC results at 3%/3 mm were in good agreement with film dosimetry for most cases. We observed a significant reduction in QA time on using AC for SABR QA. This study showed that AC results are comparable to film dosimetry for all studied sites except for spine IMRT SABR.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估使用ArcCHECK(AC)作为替代膜剂量法的替代方法,以进行三维共形放射治疗,强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)的治疗前质量保证(QA) ,以及容积调制弧光治疗(VMAT)立体定向消融放射治疗(SABR)治疗计划。材料和方法:选择25例接受SABR的肺,脊柱,骨,胸骨,肋骨,肩cap骨和股骨诊断不同的患者。使用电离室和薄膜剂量测定法对所有患者进行治疗前质量检查。还对AC体模进行了测量。使用四种不同的伽玛标准比较了AC设备和EBT3膜的计划和测量剂量:2%/ 2 mm,3%/ 2 mm,3%/ 1 mm和3%/ 3 mm。结果:在所有非脊柱SABR患者中,AC和胶片的平均伽玛通过率分别为98.79±0.96和99.27±1.03,均为3%/ 3 mm。脊柱VMAT SABR在3%/ 2 mm处的平均通过率分别为98.76±0.42和99.43±0.27,脊柱IMRT SABR分别为87.15±2.45和99.79±0.14。在脊柱肿瘤的情况下,由于脊髓接近计划目标体积,伽玛标准变得更严格。我们的结果表明,AC为所有VMAT SABR计划提供了良好的结果。结论:在大多数情况下,3%/ 3 mm的AC结果与胶片剂量法非常吻合。我们观察到使用AC进行SABR QA可以大大减少QA时间。这项研究表明,除了脊柱IMRT SABR外,所有研究部位的AC结果均与胶片剂量法相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号