首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Systematic Review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and Depression (2): What Is Known About Depression ISGs?
【24h】

Systematic Review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and Depression (2): What Is Known About Depression ISGs?

机译:对Internet支持组(ISG)和抑郁症的系统评价(2):对抑郁症ISG有什么了解?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Internet support groups (ISGs) are a popular means by which consumers with depression communicate online. A number of studies have evaluated the nature and impact of depression-specific ISGs. However, to date there have been no published systematic reviews of this evidence.Objective: The aim was to systematically identify and summarize the available evidence concerning the scope and findings of studies of depression ISGs.Methods: Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane) were searched using over 150 search terms extracted from relevant papers, abstracts, and a thesaurus. Papers were included if they employed an online peer-to-peer depression-specific support group and reported either quantitative or qualitative empirical data. The objective of each study was coded according to a 20-category classification system, which included the effect on depression and other outcomes, including help seeking; user characteristics, activity, satisfaction, perceived benefits, perceived disadvantages; the reason for using the ISG; the nature of ISG posts; characteristics of depression ISGs compared to other ISG types, face-to-face groups, and face-to-face counseling; ISG structure and longitudinal changes; and predictors of ISG adherence.Results: Thirteen papers satisfied the inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 12,692 abstracts. Of these, three collected data using survey questionnaires, nine analyzed samples of posts, and one both collected survey data and analyzed a sample of posts. The quality of most studies was not high, and little data were collected on most key aspects of depression ISGs. The most common objective of the studies was to analyze the nature of the posts (eight studies) and to describe site usage (six studies) and user characteristics (five studies). The most prevalent types of social support were emotional, informational, and social companionship.Conclusions: Given the popularity of depression ISGs and the paucity of available evidence about them, there is a need for high-quality, systematic studies of these groups, their impact, and the characteristics of their members and users. Such information is required to inform decision making by consumers, provider and educational organizations, guideline developers, policy makers, and funding bodies considering using, recommending, providing, or funding such groups.
机译:背景:互联网支持小组(ISG)是一种使抑郁症患者在线交流的流行手段。许多研究评估了抑郁症特定ISG的性质和影响。然而,迄今为止,尚无有关该证据的系统性综述。目的:旨在系统地识别和总结有关抑郁症ISG研究范围和发现的现有证据。方法:三个数据库(PubMed,PsycINFO,Cochrane)使用从相关论文,摘要和词库中提取的150多个搜索词进行搜索。如果论文雇用的是对等抑郁症在线支持小组,并且报告了定量或定性的经验数据,则包括在内。每项研究的目的均根据20类分类系统进行编码,其中包括对抑郁症和其他结果的影响,包括寻求帮助;用户特征,活动,满意度,感知收益,感知劣势;使用ISG的原因; ISG职位的性质;与其他ISG类型,面对面小组和面对面咨询相比,抑郁ISG的特征; ISG的结构和纵向变化;结果:ISG依从性的预测因子。结果:13篇论文从最初的12692篇摘要中满足了纳入标准。其中,使用调查问卷收集了三份数据,分析了九份职位样本,其中一份收集了调查数据并分析了一份样本。大多数研究的质量不高,关于抑郁症ISG的大多数关键方面的数据很少。研究的最普遍目标是分析职位的性质(八项研究)并描述站点使用情况(六项研究)和用户特征(五项研究)。结论:鉴于抑郁ISG的流行以及缺乏关于ISG的可用证据,因此需要对这些群体及其影响进行高质量,系统的研究,这是最普遍的社会支持类型。 ,以及其成员和用户的特征。需要此类信息,以告知消费者,提供者和教育组织,指南制定者,政策制定者以及考虑使用,推荐,提供或资助此类团体的资助机构的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号