首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Self-Management Support Using a Digital Health System Compared With Usual Care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Self-Management Support Using a Digital Health System Compared With Usual Care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:使用数字医疗系统的自我管理支持与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的常规治疗相比:随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a digital health system supporting clinical care through monitoring and self-management support in community-based patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a fully automated Internet-linked, tablet computer-based system of monitoring and self-management support (EDGE? sElf-management anD support proGrammE) in improving quality of life and clinical outcomes.Methods: We compared daily use of EDGE with usual care for 12 months. The primary outcome was COPD-specific health status measured with the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-C).Results: A total of 166 patients were randomized (110 EDGE, 56 usual care). All patients were included in an intention to treat analysis. The estimated difference in SGRQ-C at 12 months (EDGE?usual care) was ?1.7 with a 95% CI of ?6.6 to 3.2 (P=.49). The relative risk of hospital admission for EDGE was 0.83 (0.56-1.24, P=.37) compared with usual care. Generic health status (EQ-5D, EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire) between the groups differed significantly with better health status for the EDGE group (0.076, 95% CI 0.008-0.14, P=.03). The median number of visits to general practitioners for EDGE versus usual care were 4 versus 5.5 (P=.06) and to practice nurses were 1.5 versus 2.5 (P=.03), respectively.Conclusions: The EDGE clinical trial does not provide evidence for an effect on COPD-specific health status?in comparison with usual care, despite uptake of the intervention. However, there appears to be an overall benefit in generic health status; and?the effect sizes for improved depression score, reductions in hospital admissions, and general practice visits warrants further evaluation?and could make an important contribution to supporting people with COPD.Trial registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 40367841; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN40367841 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6pmfIJ9KK)
机译:背景:我们对通过监测和自我管理支持以社区为基础的中重度至重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行数字医疗系统支持临床护理的随机对照试验。目的:本研究旨在确定基于互联网的,基于平板电脑的全自动互联网监视和自我管理支持系统(EDGE?self-managed and proGrammE)在改善生活质量和临床结果方面的功效。方法:我们比较了EDGE的日常使用通常护理12个月。主要结局是采用圣乔治COPD呼吸问卷(SGRQ-C)测量的COPD特定健康状况。结果:总共166例患者被随机分组​​(110 EDGE,56例常规护理)。所有患者均被纳入意向治疗分析。 SGRQ-C在12个月(EDGE常规护理)时的估计差异为1.7,95%CI为6.6至3.2(P = .49)。与常规护理相比,EDGE入院的相对风险为0.83(0.56-1.24,P = .37)。各组之间的一般健康状况(EQ-5D,EuroQol 5维问卷)之间存在显着差异,EDGE组的健康状况更好(0.076,95%CI 0.008-0.14,P = .03)。 EDGE与普通护理人员就诊的中位数分别为4比5.5(P = .06)和执业护士的拜访中位数分别为1.5和2.5(P = .03)。结论:EDGE临床试验未提供证据尽管采取了干预措施,但与常规护理相比,仍对COPD特定的健康状况有影响?但是,仿制药健康状况似乎总体上具有益处;试验注册:国际标准随机对照试验号码(ISRCTN):40367841;以及“抑郁指数的改善,住院人数的减少和一般就诊的影响大小值得进一步评估,并且可以为支持COPD患者做出重要贡献。” http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN40367841(由WebCite存档,网址为http://www.webcitation.org/6pmfIJ9KK)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号