首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Microbiology: An Official Journal of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland >Performance of the FilmArray? blood culture identification panel utilized by non-expert staff compared with conventional microbial identification and antimicrobial resistance gene detection from positive blood cultures
【24h】

Performance of the FilmArray? blood culture identification panel utilized by non-expert staff compared with conventional microbial identification and antimicrobial resistance gene detection from positive blood cultures

机译:FilmArray的性能?非专家人员使用的血液培养物鉴定小组与常规细菌鉴定和从阳性血液培养物检测到的抗菌素耐药基因检测结果进行了比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Utilization of commercially available rapid platforms for microbial identification from positive blood cultures is useful during periods of, or in laboratories with, limited expert staffing. We compared the results of the FilmArray? BCID Panel performed by non-expert technologists to those of conventional methods for organism identification performed by skilled microbiologists. Within 8 h of signalling positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system, positive bottles were analysed by the FilmArray BCID Panel. Data from these analyses were compared to standard-of-care testing, which included conventional and automated methods. To gauge the ease of use of the BCID Panel by non-expert staff, technologists unfamiliar with diagnostic bacteriology performed the testing without prior knowledge of the Gram stain results, or even whether organisms were detected. Identifications of 172/200 (86?%) positive blood cultures using the BCID Panel were consistent with identifications provided by standard-of-care methods. Standard-of-care testing identified organisms in 20 positive blood cultures, which were not represented on the BCID Panel. Seven (3.5?%) blood cultures demonstrated a discrepancy between the methods, which could not be attributed to either a lack of representation on the panel or unclear separate detection of organisms in a mixed blood culture of a shared genus or grouping of organisms, e.g. Staphylococcus or Enterobacteriaceae . One (0.5?%) blood culture yielded invalid results on two separate panels, so it was eliminated from the study. The easy-to-use FilmArray? technology shows good correlation with blood culture identification and antibiotic resistance detection performed by conventional methods. This technology may be particularly useful in laboratories with limited staffing or limited technical expertise.
机译:利用市售的快速平台从阳性血液培养物中鉴定微生物,在专家人员有限的时期内或实验室中很有用。我们比较了FilmArray的结果吗?由非专家技术人员执行的BCID小组,与由熟练微生物学家进行的常规生物识别方法相同。在连续监测血液培养系统发出阳性信号的8小时内,FilmArray BCID面板分析了阳性瓶。将来自这些分析的数据与照护服务标准测试进行比较,该服务包括常规和自动化方法。为了评估非专家人员对BCID面板的易用性,对诊断细菌学不熟悉的技术人员无需事先了解革兰氏染色结果,甚至没有发现生物就进行了测试。使用BCID面板对172/200(86%)阳性血液培养物的鉴定与护理标准方法提供的鉴定一致。护理标准测试可识别出20种阳性血液培养物中的生物,而这些生物在BCID小组中并未体现。七种(3.5%)的血液培养物证明了这两种方法之间的差异,这不能归因于面板上缺乏代表性或在共有属或混合生物体的混合血液培养物中对生物体的单独检测不明确,例如葡萄球菌或肠杆菌科。在两个单独的面板上,一次(0.5 %%)血液培养产生无效结果,因此将其从研究中删除。易于使用的FilmArray?该技术与常规方法进行的血培养鉴定和抗生素耐药性检测显示出良好的相关性。该技术在人员配备有限或技术专长有限的实验室中可能特别有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号