...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study
【24h】

Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study

机译:医疗保健提供者是否使用在线患者评分来改善护理质量?基于在线的跨部门研究的结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Physician-rating websites have become a popular tool to create more transparency about the quality of health care providers. So far, it remains unknown whether online-based rating websites have the potential to contribute to a better standard of care.Objective: Our goal was to examine which health care providers use online rating websites and for what purposes, and whether health care providers use online patient ratings to improve patient care.Methods: We conducted an online-based cross-sectional study by surveying 2360 physicians and other health care providers (September 2015). In addition to descriptive statistics, we performed multilevel logistic regression models to ascertain the effects of providers’ demographics as well as report card-related variables on the likelihood that providers implement measures to improve patient care.Results: Overall, more than half of the responding providers surveyed (54.66%, 1290/2360) used online ratings to derive measures to improve patient care (implemented measures: mean 3.06, SD 2.29). Ophthalmologists (68%, 40/59) and gynecologists (65.4%, 123/188) were most likely to implement any measures. The most widely implemented quality measures were related to communication with patients (28.77%, 679/2360), the appointment scheduling process (23.60%, 557/2360), and office workflow (21.23%, 501/2360). Scaled-survey results had a greater impact on deriving measures than narrative comments. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed medical specialty, the frequency of report card use, and the appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-survey ratings to be significantly associated predictors for implementing measures to improve patient care because of online ratings.Conclusions: Our results suggest that online ratings displayed on physician-rating websites have an impact on patient care. Despite the limitations of our study and unintended consequences of physician-rating websites, they still may have the potential to improve patient care.
机译:背景:医师评分网站已成为一种流行的工具,可以提高医疗保健提供者的质量透明度。到目前为止,基于在线的评级网站是否有潜力为改善医疗水平做出贡献尚不明确。目的:我们的目标是检查哪些医疗保健提供者使用在线评级网站以及出于什么目的,以及医疗保健提供者是否使用在线患者评分,以改善患者护理。方法:我们通过对2360名医生和其他医疗服务提供者进行调查,进行了基于在线的横断面研究(2015年9月)。除了描述性统计数据外,我们还执行了多级Logistic回归模型来确定提供者的人口统计学以及报告卡相关变量对提供者实施改善患者护理措施的可能性的影响。结果:总体而言,超过一半的响应者接受调查的提供者(54.66%,1290/2360)使用在线评分来得出改善患者护理的措施(实施措施:平均值3.06,标准差2.29)。眼科医生(68%,40/59)和妇科医生(65.4%,123/188)最有可能采取任何措施。实施最广泛的质量措施涉及与患者的沟通(28.77%,679/2360),约会安排过程(23.60%,557/2360)和办公室工作流程(21.23%,501/2360)。比例调查的结果对派生指标的影响要大于叙述性评论。多级Logistic回归模型揭示了医学专长,报告卡使用频率以及对规模调查评分的可信度的评估是与在线评分相关的重要指标,这些评分是实施改善患者护理措施的重要预测指标。在医师评分网站上显示的评分会影响患者的护理。尽管我们的研究存在局限性,并且获得了医师评级网站的意想不到的后果,但它们仍可能具有改善患者护理的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号