首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >The Clinical Effectiveness of Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Face-to-Face Therapist Support for Depressed Primary Care Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

The Clinical Effectiveness of Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Face-to-Face Therapist Support for Depressed Primary Care Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:基于网络的认知行为疗法与面对面治疗师支持的抑郁症初级保健患者的临床疗效:随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Most patients with mild to moderate depression receive treatment in primary care, but despite guideline recommendations, structured psychological interventions are infrequently delivered. Research supports the effectiveness of Internet-based treatment for depression; however, few trials have studied the effect of the MoodGYM program plus therapist support. The use of such interventions could improve the delivery of treatment in primary care.Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of a guided Web-based intervention for mild to moderate depression, which could be suitable for implementation in general practice.Methods: Participants (N=106) aged between 18 and 65 years were recruited from primary care and randomly allocated to a treatment condition comprising 6 weeks of therapist-assisted Web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), or to a 6-week delayed treatment condition. The intervention included the Norwegian version of the MoodGYM program, brief face-to-face support from a psychologist, and reminder emails. The primary outcome measure, depression symptoms, was measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Secondary outcome measures included the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D). All outcomes were based on self-report and were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and at 6-month follow-up.Results: Postintervention measures were completed by 37 (71%) and 47 (87%) of the 52 participants in the intervention and 54 participants in the delayed treatment group, respectively. Linear mixed-models analyses revealed a significant difference in time trends between the groups for the BDI-II, (P=.002), for HADS depression and anxiety subscales (P<.001 and P=.001, respectively), and for the SWLS (P<.001). No differential group effects were found for the BAI and the EQ-5D. In comparison to the control group, significantly more participants in the intervention group experienced recovery from depression as measured by the BDI-II. Of the 52 participants in the treatment program, 31 (60%) adhered to the program, and overall treatment satisfaction was high. The reduction of depression and anxiety symptoms was largely maintained at 6-month follow-up, and positive gains in life satisfaction were partly maintained.Conclusions: The intervention combining MoodGYM and brief therapist support can be an effective treatment of depression in a sample of primary care patients. The intervention alleviates depressive symptoms and has a significant positive effect on anxiety symptoms and satisfaction with life. Moderate rates of nonadherence and predominately positive evaluations of the treatment also indicate the acceptability of the intervention. The intervention could potentially be used in a stepped-care approach, but remains to be tested in regular primary health care.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12610000257066; http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/trial.aspx?trialid=ACTRN12610000257066 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Ie3YhIZa).
机译:背景:大多数轻度至中度抑郁症患者在初级保健中接受治疗,但是尽管有指导性建议,但很少进行有组织的心理干预。研究支持基于互联网的抑郁症治疗的有效性;但是,很少有试验研究MoodGYM计划和治疗师支持的效果。目的:评估基于指导的基于Web的轻度至中度抑郁症的干预措施的有效性和可接受性,该方法可能适合在一般实践中实施。从初级保健中招募年龄在18至65岁之间的N = 106),并随机分配至包括6周治疗师协助的基于Web的认知行为疗法(CBT)的治疗条件或6周延迟治疗条件。干预措施包括MoodGYM计划的挪威语版本,心理学家的简短面对面支持以及提醒电子邮件。主要的结局指标是抑郁症状,由贝克抑郁量表II(BDI-II)进行测量。次要结果指标包括贝克焦虑量表(BAI),医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS),生活满意度量表(SWLS)和EuroQol集团5维自我报告调查表(EQ-5D)。所有结果均基于自我报告,并在基线,干预后和6个月随访时进行评估。结果:干预的52位参与者中有37位(71%)和47位(87%)完成了干预后措施延迟治疗组分别为54名和54名参与者。线性混合模型分析显示,BDI-II组(P = .002),HADS抑郁症和焦虑量表(分别为P <.001和P = .001)和BDI-II组之间的​​时间趋势存在显着差异。 SWLS(P <.001)。对于BAI和EQ-5D,未发现差异组效应。与对照组相比,干预组的参与者有更多的经历了抑郁症的康复,这是由BDI-II测得的。在该治疗计划的52位参与者中,有31位(60%)坚持该计划,总体治疗满意度很高。在随访6个月后,抑郁和焦虑症状的减轻基本保持,部分维持了生活满意度的积极提高。照顾病人。该干预措施减轻了抑郁症状,对焦虑症状和生活满意度具有明显的积极作用。适度的不依从率以及对治疗的积极评价也表明干预措施的可接受性。该干预措施可能会用于分步护理方法中,但仍需在常规的初级卫生保健中进行测试。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册处:ACTRN12610000257066; http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/trial.aspx?trialid=ACTRN12610000257066(由WebCite存档,网址为http://www.webcitation.org/6Ie3YhIZa)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号