首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Association of Physicians of India >Acute inflammatory Ankle Arthritis in Northern India – L?fgren’s Syndrome or Poncet’s Disease?
【24h】

Acute inflammatory Ankle Arthritis in Northern India – L?fgren’s Syndrome or Poncet’s Disease?

机译:印度北部的急性炎症性踝关节炎-L?fgren综合征还是Poncet病?

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To analyse patients presenting with acute inflammatory ankle arthritis from an aetiological standpoint; whether they had L?fgren’s syndrome (acute presentation of sarcoidosis), or Poncet’s disease (reactive arthritis due to tuberculosis infection). An additional objective was to establish a simple, practical yet optimal algorithm for diagnostic approach and management of such patients. Methods: The study included 18 patients from northern India presenting with isolated acute inflammatory ankle arthritis. A combination of complete clinical evaluation, Mantoux test and contrast-enhanced computerised tomography (CE-CT) of the chest w as carried out and results analysed. Results: Among 18 patients presenting as inflammatory ankle arthritis is was possible to classify 10 of them as L?fgren’s syndrome all of whom had negative Mantoux test and bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy without central necrosis. The other 8 patients could be classified as Poncet’s disease as all of them had positive Mantoux test and showed mediastinal lymphadenopathy with or without unilateral hilar lymph nodes, with central necrosis. Finally, appropriate drug treatment (glucocorticoids with glucocorticoid-sparing drugs methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine in patients with L?fgren’s syndrome; standard anti-tuberculosis drugs in Poncet’s disease) gave excellent clinical response and patients remained w ell over a period of 1 y ear of follow-up. Conclusion: Investigated on standard lines without any invasive procedure, patients with isolated inflammatory ankle arthritis could be classified in 2 distinct categories namely: (1) L?fgren’s syndrome in its complete (with EN) or incomplete (without EN) form; (2) Poncet’s disease. Appropriate treatment gave satisfactory response and patients remained well over a period of 1 y ear of follow-up.
机译:目的:从病因学角度分析患有急性炎性踝关节炎的患者;他们患有L?fgren综合征(结节病的急性表现)还是Poncet病(由于结核病感染引起的反应性关节炎)。另一个目标是建立一种简单,实用且最佳的算法,用于诊断和管理此类患者。方法:该研究包括来自印度北部的18例急性孤立性炎性踝关节炎患者。进行完整的临床评估,Mantoux测试和胸部增强对比计算机断层扫描(CE-CT)的结合,并对结果进行分析。结果:在表现为炎性踝关节炎的18例患者中,有10例可以归为L?fgren综合征,他们的Mantoux试验均为阴性,双侧肺门淋巴结病无中心坏死。其他8例患者均被Mantoux检验阳性,并表现为纵隔淋巴结肿大,伴或不伴单侧肺门淋巴结肿大,并伴有中央坏死,可归为Poncet病。最后,适当的药物治疗(L?fgren综合征患者中使用糖皮质激素与保留糖皮质激素的药物甲氨蝶呤和羟氯喹;庞塞特病中的标准抗结核药物)产生了出色的临床反应,并且患者在随访后的1年内仍保持良好状态-向上。结论:按标准线进行调查,无任何侵入性手术,孤立性炎性踝关节炎患者可分为两类:(1)完全(带EN)或不完全(无EN)形式的L'fgren综合征; (2)庞塞氏病。适当的治疗可产生满意的反应,并且患者在随访的1年内保持良好状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号