首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Surgical specimen histology revealed inadequacy of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration sample in the diagnosis of adenosquamous lung carcinoma
【24h】

Surgical specimen histology revealed inadequacy of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration sample in the diagnosis of adenosquamous lung carcinoma

机译:手术标本组织学检查显示常规经支气管针吸标本不足以诊断腺鳞癌

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (cTBNA) in the subtyping of lesions located in or around central airways by comparing the histological diagnosis based on TBNA and surgical specimens. Materials and methods: cTBNA was conducted in consecutive patients with lesions located in or around the central airways (trachea, left and right primary bronchi, hilar and mediastinal masses or lymph nodes) between October 2012 and May 2014 in Wuhan No. 1 Hospital. The aspirated specimens in all patients were performed cytological and/or histopathological examination. Of these patients, some were subjected to surgical resection and histopathological examination was performed by the Department of Pathology. In the patients with gross specimens, the final diagnosis was established based on histopathological results from these specimens. Results: In 63 patients diagnosed with cTBNA for the lesions located in or around the central airways, 23 patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer or atypical hyperplasia underwent surgery. The final diagnosis based on histopathology of surgery specimen was lung cancer in 22 patients [3 small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 9 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 5 adenocarcinoma (ADC), 4 adenosquamous carcinoma (ADS) and 1 neuroendocrine carcinoma], and inflammatory pseudotumor in 1 patient. The overall diagnostic yield of cTBNA for lung cancer was 95.7% (22/23), but the accuracy for histological typing of lung cancer is only 63.6% (14/22), for adenosquamous lung carcinoma was only 25% (1/4). Conclusions: cTBNA is a safe and effective procedure that can be used for the diagnosis of central lung cancer. However, the accuracy of TBNA for the histological classification of lung cancer is relatively low, especially for adenosquamous lung carcinoma.
机译:目的:通过比较基于TBNA和手术标本的组织学诊断,回顾性回顾了常规经支气管针吸术(cTBNA)在中央气道内或周围病变的亚型中的准确性。材料和方法:2012年10月至2014年5月在武汉市第一医院对连续患者进行了cTBNA的研究,这些患者位于中央气道或其周围(气管,左右主支气管,肺门和纵隔肿块或淋巴结)。对所有患者的抽吸标本进行了细胞学和/或组织病理学检查。在这些患者中,有些接受了手术切除,病理科进行了组织病理学检查。在具有大体标本的患者中,根据这些标本的组织病理学结果确定最终诊断。结果:在63例被诊断为cTBNA的中央气道或其周围病变的患者中,有23例被诊断为肺癌或非典型增生的患者接受了手术。根据手术标本的病理组织学,最终诊断为22例肺癌[3例小细胞肺癌(SCLC),9例鳞状细胞癌(SCC),5例腺癌(ADC),4例腺鳞癌(ADS)和1例神经内分泌癌]。和1例炎性假瘤。 cTBNA对肺癌的整体诊断率为95.7%(22/23),但是肺癌的组织学分型准确度仅为63.6%(14/22),对于腺鳞状肺癌仅为25%(1/4) 。结论:cTBNA是一种安全有效的方法,可用于诊断中心型肺癌。然而,TBNA在肺癌的组织学分类中的准确性相对较低,尤其是对于腺鳞状肺癌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号