...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Cost and effectiveness of image-guided radiotherapy for non-operated localized lung cancer: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis
【24h】

Cost and effectiveness of image-guided radiotherapy for non-operated localized lung cancer: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis

机译:非手术局部肺癌的影像引导放射治疗的成本和效果:基于人群的倾向评分匹配分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is a novel technology to enhance RT delivery accuracy. However, the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are less clear. The aim of our study is to compare the cost and effectiveness of conventional fractionated RT for non-operated localized lung cancer delivered with vs. without IGRT via this population-based propensity score (PS) matched analysis. Methods: We identified eligible patients diagnosed within 2007-2010 through a comprehensive population-based database containing cancer, death registries, and reimbursement data in Taiwan. The primary duration of interest (DOI) was 2 years within diagnosis. Effectiveness was measured as survival whereas direct medical cost was measured from the payers’ perspective. In supplementary analysis (SA), we estimated the cost-effectiveness in consider of out-of-pocket (OOP) payment and 4 years as DOI. Results: Our study population constituted 124 patients. Within 2 years, both the mean cost (2014 USD) and survival (life-year, LY) were higher for IGRT ($60,774 vs . $60,554; 1.43 vs . 1.37). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) when IGRT was compared to non-IGRT was 3,667 (USD/LY). The chance for IGRT to be cost-effective was around 68% & 70% at willingness-to-pay threshold 50,000 USD/LY and 150,000 USD/LY respectively. IGRT remained cost-effective in SA. Conclusions: We provide the first empirical evidence that when compared to non-IGRT, IGRT was potentially cost-effective.
机译:背景:图像引导放射疗法(IGRT)是一种提高RT递送准确性的新颖技术。但是,临床效果和成本效益尚不清楚。我们这项研究的目的是通过基于人群的倾向得分(PS)匹配分析,比较常规分次RT术对接受IGRT或不进行IGRT的非手术局限性肺癌的治疗成本和有效性。方法:我们通过包含台湾癌症,死亡登记和报销数据的综合人群数据库,确定了2007-2010年期间诊断出的合格患者。诊断期间主要关注时间(DOI)为2年。有效性以生存率衡量,而直接医疗费用则从付款人的角度衡量。在补充分析(SA)中,我们考虑了自费(OOP)付款和4年作为DOI的成本效益。结果:我们的研究人群共有124例患者。在2年内,IGRT的平均成本(2014年美元)和生存期(生命年,LY)均更高(60,774美元对60,554美元; 1.43对1.37)。将IGRT与非IGRT进行比较时,增量成本效益比(ICER)为3,667(USD / LY)。在支付意愿门槛分别为50,000美元/年和150,000美元/年的情况下,IGRT具有成本效益的机会分别约为68%和70%。 IGRT在南非仍然具有成本效益。结论:我们提供了第一个经验证据,与非IGRT相比,IGRT具有潜在的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号