...
首页> 外文期刊>JRSM Open >Writer’s cramp: is focal dystonia the best explanation?
【24h】

Writer’s cramp: is focal dystonia the best explanation?

机译:作家的抽筋:局部肌张力障碍是最好的解释吗?

获取原文

摘要

Often considered no more than an historical curiosity, writer’s cramp remains an important disability in the workplace and the mechanism, which has puzzled the best medical minds for generations, remains contentious. A remarkable range of hypotheses has been put forward to try and explain a disability which periodically reached epidemic and economically worrying levels, but in the end medical opinion has accepted the explanation put forward by neurologists Sheehy and Marsden in 1983 that this was caused by a form of focal dystonia. However, the majority of the historical descriptions of writer’s cramp do not fit the classical parameters of focal dystonia and are more accurately described as a progressive forearm muscle fatigue. Today’s keyboard operators continue to complain of symptoms identical to their clerical forebears demonstrating that this is a problem which has evolved but not disappeared; this has the paradoxical advantage that modern research techniques enable this complaint to be revisited. The result shows that two varieties of writer’s cramp have always existed and while focal dystonia remains a valid explanation for a minority of cases, the much more common fatigue-based complaint is better explained by chronic compartment syndrome of the forearm.
机译:人们通常认为,抽筋只是一种历史上的好奇心,它仍然是工作场所的一个重要障碍,而困扰着几代人最好的医学思想的机制仍然存在争议。提出了一系列惊人的假设来尝试并解释一种周期性地达到流行病和经济担忧水平的残疾,但是最终医学意见接受了神经学家Sheehy和Marsden在1983年提出的解释,认为这是由某种形式引起的。局灶性肌张力障碍。但是,关于作家抽筋的大多数历史描述都与局灶性肌张力障碍的经典参数不符,可以更准确地描述为进行性前臂肌肉疲劳。当今的键盘操作员继续抱怨与他们的前辈相同的症状,表明这是一个已经发展但并未消失的问题。这具有矛盾的优势,即现代研究技术可以使这种抱怨得以重新审视。结果表明,作家抽筋的两种情况一直存在,尽管局灶性肌张力障碍仍然是少数病例的有效解释,但较常见的基于疲劳的主诉可以通过前臂慢性室间隔综合征得到更好的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号