首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched comparative analysis
【24h】

Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched comparative analysis

机译:单端口电视胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的倾向匹配比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)-assisted lobectomy is widely used to treat non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). There are no reports concerning the comparison between single-port VATS and two-port VATS in treating NSCLC. This study aimed to compare the perioperative and short-term follow-up results between these two methods for treating NSCLC. Methods: A retrospective surgical evaluation of patients undergoing either single-port VATS or two-port VATS for NSCLC between January 2013 and June 2015 was conducted. The propensity score (PS) matching method was used to reduce selection bias by creating two groups. After generating the PSs, 1:1 ratio and nearest-neighbor score matching was completed. The primary outcome measures were surgical time, blood loss, drainage time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score and patient satisfaction score. The data were analyzed statistically with P Results: Of the 143 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 66 (46.2%) were operated on using two-port VATS and 77 (53.8%) using single-port VATS. After 1-to-1 PS matching, 63 pairs were selected. Both groups were well balanced for age, gender, body mass index, pulmonary function, preoperative comorbidity, tumor size and tumor type. The single-port VATS group had less blood loss, less postoperative pain, and a higher satisfaction score than those in the two-port VATS group, with statistical significance. Postoperative complications occurred in 2 (2/63, 3.2%) patients in the single-port VATS group and 6 (6/63, 9.5%) patients in the two-port VATS group, not a significant difference. No deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusions: A single-port VATS-assisted lobectomy is suggested to be safe and feasible for treating NSCLC. Compared with two-port VATS, single-port VATS has many advantages, including reduced blood loss, less postoperative pain and a higher satisfaction score.
机译:背景:电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)辅助肺叶切除术广泛用于治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。没有报道关于单端口VATS和两端口VATS在NSCLC治疗中的比较。本研究旨在比较这两种治疗非小细胞肺癌的方法的围手术期和短期随访结果。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月至2015年6月接受单端口VATS或两端口VATS的NSCLC患者的手术效果。倾向得分(PS)匹配方法用于通过创建两个组来减少选择偏差。生成PS后,完成1:1比率和最近邻得分匹配。主要结果指标是手术时间,失血量,引流时间,住院时间,术后疼痛评分和患者满意度评分。数据用P统计分析。结果:143例符合纳入标准的患者中,有66例(46.2%)使用两端口VATS进行手术,而77例(53.8%)使用单端口VATS进行手术。在一对一的PS匹配之后,选择了63对。两组在年龄,性别,体重指数,肺功能,术前合并症,肿瘤大小和肿瘤类型方面都达到了平衡。单端口VATS组比两端口VATS组失血少,术后疼痛少,满意度高,具有统计学意义。单端口VATS组中有2例(2 / 63,3.2%)患者发生了术后并发症,而两端口VATS组中有6例(6 / 63,9.5%)患者发生了术后并发症,差异无统计学意义。在随访期间未发生死亡。结论:单孔VATS辅助肺叶切除术治疗NSCLC是安全可行的。与两端口VATS相比,单端口VATS具有许多优势,包括出血量减少,术后疼痛减轻和满意度较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号