首页> 外文期刊>JSLS : >Robotic Trachelectomy After Supracervical Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease
【24h】

Robotic Trachelectomy After Supracervical Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

机译:良性妇科疾病行经子宫子宫切除后机器人气管切开术

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Objectives: A renewed interest in the supra cervical approach to hysterectomy has created a cohort of patients with a retained cervix at risk of persistent symptoms requiring a subsequent trachelectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of robotic trachelectomy after a previous supracervical hysterectomy. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of women who had robotic trachelectomy after supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease from January 2009 through October 2014. Results: Eleven patients underwent robotic trachelectomy for benign conditions during the observed period. Prior supracervical hysterectomy had been performed for pelvic pain (8/11, 73%), abnormal uterine bleeding (7/11, 64%), and dysmenorrhea (5/11, 45%). In 10 of 11 patients, the symptoms leading to robotic trachelectomy were the same as those leading to supracervical hysterectomy. The time from hysterectomy to recurrence of symptoms ranged from 0.5 to 26 months (median, 6), whereas the time interval from previous surgery to robotic trachelectomy ranged from 1 to 57 months (median, 26). Mean age and body mass index at robotic trachelectomy were 42 ± 5.4 years and 32 ± 6.1 kg/m2. Mean length of surgery was 218 ± 88 minutes (range, 100–405). There was 1 major postoperative complication involving bladder perforation and subsequent vesicovaginal fistula (VVF). Endometriosis was seen in 27% of pathologic specimens and cervicitis in another 27%; 45% showed normal tissue histology. In 6 (55%) cases, symptoms leading to trachelectomy resolved completely after surgery, and the other 5 (45%) patients reported a significant improvement. Conclusions: Although trachelectomy can be a challenging surgery, our experience suggests that the robotic approach may be a valuable means of achieving safe and reproducible outcomes.
机译:背景与目的:对上颈子宫切除术的新兴趣引起了一批保留了子宫颈且有持续症状风险且需要进行气管切开术的患者。这项研究的目的是评估在先前的经子宫子宫切除后机器人气管切开术的疗效。方法:这是一项回顾性图表回顾,回顾性分析了从2009年1月至2014年10月因良性妇科疾病行经子宫子宫切除后机器人气管切开术的女性。结果:在观察期内,有11名患者因良性状况接受了机器人气管切开术。对于骨盆疼痛(8 / 11,73%),子宫异常出血(7 / 11,64%)和痛经(5 / 11,45%),已进行了经颈上子宫全切术。在11例患者中,有10例导致机器人气管切开术的症状与导致膀胱上子宫切除术的症状相同。从子宫切除术到症状复发的时间为0.5到26个月(中位数为6),而从以前的手术到机器人气管切开术的时间间隔为1到57个月(中位数为26)。机器人气管切开术的平均年龄和体重指数分别为42±5.4岁和32±6.1 kg / m 2 。平均手术时间为218±88分钟(范围100–405)。术后主要并发症1例,涉及膀胱穿孔和随后的阴道阴道瘘(VVF)。 27%的病理标本可见子宫内膜异位,另有27%的宫颈炎。 45%的患者组织组织学正常。在6例(55%)的病例中,导致气管切除术的症状在手术后完全消失,其他5例(45%)的患者报告有明显改善。结论:尽管气管切开术可能是一项具有挑战性的手术,但我们的经验表明,机器人方法可能是实现安全且可重现的结果的宝贵手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号