...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health >Comparison of reverse line blot and -tubulin targeted nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques in the detection of Theileria and Babesia piroplasms in cattle in Uganda
【24h】

Comparison of reverse line blot and -tubulin targeted nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques in the detection of Theileria and Babesia piroplasms in cattle in Uganda

机译:反向线印迹和微管蛋白靶向巢式聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术在乌干达牛中检测到的泰勒菌和巴比斯虫质的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Three hundred (300) blood samples from apparently healthy cattle were collected?in areas around Lake Mburo National Park in Western Uganda. These were?used in the comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of reverse line blot (RLB) and?β-tubulin targeted nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the detection of tick-borne piroplasms in cattle. The sensitivity of RLB technique for the detection of?Theileria?andBabesia?species was 71.25% (95% CI: 60.05 to 80.82%) and the specificity was 57.50% (95% CI: 40.89 to 72.960%) while the sensitivity of the beta-tubulin targeted nested PCR was 62.5% (95% CI: 50.96 to 73.08%) and the specificity was 72.5% (95% CI: 56.11 to 85.40%). The positive predictive value using RLB was 77.03% (95% CI: 65.79 to 86.01%) and the negative predictive value was 50% (95% CI: 34.90 to 65.10%) while the positive predictive value using?β-tubulin targeted nested PCR was 81.97 % (95% CI: 70.02 to 90.64%) and the negative predictive value was 49.15% (95% CI: 35.89 to 62.50%). The Kappa statistic for level of agreement in detection of tick-borne piroplasms between RLB assay and?β-tubulin targeted nested PCR was 0.7984 which indicated substantial agreement between the two tests. The RLB assay allowed the detection of individual species that simultaneously infected the cattle. However, it was not possible to identify the species with the?β-tubulin targeted nested PCR.
机译:在乌干达西部姆布罗湖国家公园附近地区收集了三百(300)份看起来健康的牛血样。这些用于比较反向线印迹(RLB)和β-微管蛋白靶向巢式聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测牛tick传质子的敏感性和特异性。 RLB技术检测“ Theileria”和“ Babesia”物种的灵敏度为71.25%(95%CI:60.05至80.82%),特异性为57.50%(95%CI:40.89至72.960%),而β的灵敏度为-微管蛋白靶向的巢式PCR为62.5%(95%CI:50.96至73.08%),特异性为72.5%(95%CI:56.11至85.40%)。使用RLB的阳性预测值为77.03%(95%CI:65.79至86.01%),阴性的预测值为50%(95%CI:34.90至65.10%),而使用β-微管蛋白靶向的巢式PCR的阳性预测值为为81.97%(95%CI:70.02至90.64%),阴性预测值为49.15%(95%CI:35.89至62.50%)。 RLB分析和靶向ββ-微管蛋白的巢式PCR之间的壁虱携带的质子的检测一致性水平的Kappa统计值为0.7984,表明两次测试之间基本吻合。 RLB分析可以检测同时感染牛的单个物种。然而,不可能用β-微管蛋白靶向的巢式PCR来鉴定物种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号