...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine >Comparison of Sonography and Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Gallbladder Functional Studies With Cholecystokinin
【24h】

Comparison of Sonography and Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Gallbladder Functional Studies With Cholecystokinin

机译:超声和闪烁显像法在胆囊收缩素评价胆囊功能研究中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. Both sonography and scintigraphy have been used to evaluate gallbladder function with the use of sincalide (cholecystokinin [CCK]). However, the reported ejection fractions (EFs) for the two modalities are not the same. The techniques measure slightly different parameters. This study directly compared both techniques performed simultaneously on the same participants. Methods. Twenty healthy volunteers were evaluated with sonography and scintigraphy to estimate the gallbladder EF simultaneously. The gallbladder EF was calculated at 5-minute intervals for 1 hour. Results. The mean EFs ± SD were 66.3% ± 20% and 49% ± 29% for sonography and scintigraphy, respectively. The mean times to the peak EF were 38 ± 12 and 33 ± 9 minutes for sonography and scintigraphy. An average time of 34 minutes was noted after radiopharmaceutical injection before CCK administration for the scintigraphic studies. The earliest time to the peak EF for sonography was 15 minutes, and the latest time to the peak EF was 60 minutes (mode, 40 minutes); for scintigraphy, the earliest and latest times were 15 and 50 minutes (mode, 30 minutes), respectively. One participant could not be evaluated secondary to nonfilling of the gallbladder on scintigraphy. There was wider variability of the gall-bladder EF with scintigraphy than sonography. Conclusions. Scintigraphy estimated a lower EF than sonography, had wider EF variability than sonography, and required additional time (>30 minutes more) to complete the study. Scintigraphy could not be performed in 5% of the participants because of nonfilling of the gallbladder. The use of sonography to estimate the gallbladder EF is less time-consuming and less costly. With these techniques, the range of normal gallbladder EFs should be adjusted for the technique used.
机译:目的。超声检查和闪烁扫描检查均已通过使用辛卡利特(胆囊收缩素[CCK])来评估胆囊功能。但是,两种模式的报告的射血分数(EFs)不同。这些技术测量的参数略有不同。这项研究直接比较了在同一参与者上同时执行的两种技术。方法。通过超声检查和闪烁显像对20名健康志愿者进行评估,以同时评估胆囊EF。每隔5分钟计算一次胆囊EF,时间为1小时。结果。超声检查和闪烁显像的平均EFs±SD分别为66.3%±20%和49%±29%。超声检查和闪烁显像的平均EF时间为38±12分钟和33±9分钟。放射药物注射后,在进行闪烁显像研究的CCK给药之前,平均时间为34分钟。超声检查最早到达EF高峰的时间是15分钟,最晚到达EF高峰的时间是60分钟(众数,40分钟)。对于闪烁显像,最早和最晚时间分别是15分钟和50分钟(模式30分钟)。闪烁显示胆囊未充盈不能评估一名参与者。胆囊射血分数显像比超声显着。结论。闪烁显像法估计的EF低于超声检查,EF变异性比超声检查更宽,并且需要额外的时间(> 30分钟以上)来完成研究。由于胆囊未充满,无法在5%的参与者中进行闪烁扫描。用超声检查来估计胆囊EF既省时又省钱。使用这些技术,应根据所用技术调整正常胆囊EF的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号