...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Aids Society >The role of SEAD project intervention in viral suppression of HIV/AIDS patients with follow-up and adherence barriers
【24h】

The role of SEAD project intervention in viral suppression of HIV/AIDS patients with follow-up and adherence barriers

机译:SEAD项目干预在具有后续行动和依从性障碍的HIV / AIDS患者的病毒抑制中的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose of studyIrregular FUP/ADH were associated with virologic failure [1] leading to an increase in mortality [2]. SEAD was a multidimensional intervention project, designed from the patient's perspective, to specifically attend patients with poor FUP/ ADH in an HIV/AIDS outpatient clinic.MethodsFrom Jan 2006 to May 2010, patients with poor FUP/ADH were offered SEAD inclusion, all were evaluated by a nurse or a psychologist (adherence collaborators) who assessed all the reasons and barriers precluding a correct FUP/ADH. For each identified problem, different interventions were planned, using our own resources or coordinating others. Follow-up was censored in Nov 2011. Univariate and multivariable models were performed to evaluate the influence of SEAD intervention in virological suppression (HIV-ARN 90% 29.3%; median CD4 cell count 333 [164–536] cells/mL and HIV-RNA 50% of planned interventions. After a median follow-up of 3.9 (3.27–4.43) years 218 patients received 8 (3–12) interventions/year, 95% evaluation interview and 30% psychological counselling (3 sessions/year [2–5]). Virological suppression was achieved by 67% of patients. In logistic regression analysis an intervention higher than 50% of planned HR 0.220 [IC 95% (0.112–0.44)] and receiving psychological counselling HR 0.44 [IC 95% (0.20–0.97)] were independent predictors of virological suppression whereas alcohol 3.11 (95% CI 1.24–7.80) and severe biopsychosocial problems HR 2.39 (95% CI 1.134–5.040) were associated with worse virological response, after adjusting for age, alcohol or cocaine abuse, degree of adherence, baseline virological suppression, median follow–up, intravenous acquisition of HIV, and family support.ConclusionsGeneral and psychological SEAD intervention resulted in higher virological suppression in patients with severe follow-up and adherence barriers.
机译:研究目的不规则FUP / ADH与病毒学衰竭有关[1]导致死亡率增加[2]。 SEAD是一个从患者角度出发设计的多维干预项目,专门针对HIV / AIDS门诊的FUP / ADH不良患者进行治疗。方法2006年1月至2010年5月,对FUP / ADH不良的患者进行SEAD纳入,所有由护士或心理学家(依从性合作者)进行的评估,他们评估了排除正确FUP / ADH的所有原因和障碍。对于每个发现的问题,计划使用我们自己的资源或与他人协调来采取不同的干预措施。 2011年11月检查了随访情况。采用单变量和多变量模型评估SEAD干预对病毒学抑制的影响(HIV-ARN 90%29.3%; CD4细胞计数中位数333 [164-536]细胞/ mL和HIV- RNA计划干预的50%。在中位随访3.9(3.27-4.43)年后,218例患者/年接受了8(3-12)项干预,95%的评估访谈和30%的心理咨询(3堂/年[2 –5]),有67%的患者实现了病毒学抑制;在Logistic回归分析中,干预措施高于计划的HR的50%0.220 [IC 95%(0.112-0.44)],接受心理咨询的HR 0.44 [IC 95%(–95] [0.20–0.97)]是病毒学抑制的独立预测因素,而酒精度3.11(95%CI 1.24–7.80)和严重的生物心理社会问题HR 2.39(95%CI 1.134–5.040)与年龄,酒精或可卡因滥用,依从度,基线病毒学抑制,结论:一般和心理SEAD干预导致严重随访和依从性障碍患者的病毒学抑制较高。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号