...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: JCMA >Clinical analysis of 48-h emergency department visit post outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urolithiasis
【24h】

Clinical analysis of 48-h emergency department visit post outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urolithiasis

机译:门诊体外冲击波碎石术48小时急诊就诊尿路结石的临床分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Patients suffering from renal or ureteral stones can undergo significant discomfort, even when timely diagnosed and treated. The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors and safety of outpatient Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of patients with renal or ureteral stones. Methods: In this study, our cohort consisted of 844 outpatients who underwent outpatient ESWL treated between February 2012 and November 2014 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Patients who visited the emergency room (ER) within 48?h after Outpatient ESWL were included in this article. This article analyzes the stone size, stone shape (long to short axis ratio), stone location, previous medical management, urinalysis data, complications and treatment received in the emergency department. Results: Among the 844 initial consecutive patients who underwent outpatient ESWL a total of 1095 times, there were 22 (2%) patients who sought help at our emergency room within 48?h after the outpatient ESWL. Of those 22 patients, the mean age was 54.3?±?12.6 years, and the BMI was 25.9?±?3.2. The most common complication complaint was flank pain (55.2%). Other complications included hematuria (13.8%), fever (17.2%), nausea with vomiting (6.9%), acute urinary retention (3.4%) and chest tightness with cold sweating (3.4%). In 22 patients who went back to the ER, 7 patients were admitted to the ward and 1 patient again returned to the ER. All patients received medical treatment without ESWL or surgical management. The meaningful risk factor of ER-visiting rate following outpatient ESWL within 48?h was stone location, and the renal stones showed statistic significant (p?=?0.047) when compared to ureteral stones. Conclusion: Our study indicated that renal stone contributed to a significantly higher risk of ER-visiting rate to patients than did ureteral stone, following outpatient ESWL within 48?h. This study confirmed that Outpatient ESWL is a safe treatment for renal or ureteral stones, while inpatient ESWL is not absolutely necessary.
机译:背景:即使及时诊断和治疗,患有肾结石或输尿管结石的患者也可能遭受重大不适。这项研究的目的是评估门诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)在肾或输尿管结石患者治疗中的危险因素和安全性。方法:在本研究中,我们的队列由844名门诊患者组成,他们于2012年2月至2014年11月在台北荣民总医院接受了门诊ESWL治疗。本文包括门诊ESWL后48小时内到急诊室就诊的患者。本文分析了结石的大小,结石的形状(长短轴比),结石的位置,先前的医疗管理,尿液分析数据,急诊科接受的并发症和治疗。结果:在844例首次接受门诊ESWL治疗的连续患者中,共进行了1095次检查,其中22例(2%)患者在门诊ESWL治疗后48小时内到我们的急诊室寻求帮助。在这22例患者中,平均年龄为54.3±12.6岁,BMI为25.9±3.2。最常见的并发症是腰痛(55.2%)。其他并发症包括血尿(13.8%),发烧(17.2%),恶心呕吐(6.9%),急性尿retention留(3.4%)和胸闷伴冷汗(3.4%)。在22名返回急诊室的患者中,有7名患者被送往病房,另有1名患者再次回到急诊室。所有患者均接受了没有ESWL或外科手术治疗的治疗。门诊ESWL后48小时内ER访视率的有意义的危险因素是结石的位置,与输尿管结石相比,肾结石具有统计学意义(p≤0.047)。结论:我们的研究表明,在门诊ESWL术后48小时内,肾结石对患者的ER访视风险显着高于输尿管结石。这项研究证实,门诊ESWL是治疗肾结石或输尿管结石的安全方法,而住院ESWL不是绝对必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号