首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law >Commentary: Contested Wills and Will Contests
【24h】

Commentary: Contested Wills and Will Contests

机译:评论:有争议的遗嘱和遗嘱竞赛

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

When disinherited heirs challenge a will drafted by a person suspected of having dementia, a legal battle may ensue. The “lucid interval,” a brief return to competence from a state of dementia, has been invoked in years past to establish the validity of contested wills. Shulman et al. , having reviewed the medical and legal literature, make a convincing argument that no such period of competence occurs in the course of dementia. A neuropsychiatric autopsy is outlined in this commentary to provide a method of determining the validity of a last will and testament, by applying the clinical method described when witness statements do not provide accurate guidance.
机译:当无继承权的继承人挑战怀疑患有痴呆症的人草拟的遗嘱时,可能会发生法律斗争。过去数年以来,人们一直在使用“清醒间隔”(即从痴呆状态短暂恢复能力)来确定有争议遗嘱的有效性。 Shulman等。在回顾了医学和法律文献之后,提出了令人信服的论据,即在痴呆症的发生过程中没有这样的能力期限。本评论概述了神经精神科尸检,以提供一种确定遗嘱和遗嘱有效性的方法,方法是应用在证人陈述不提供准确指导时所描述的临床方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号