首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Philosophical Criticism >Advance Directives: regarding the recovery of subjectivity between independence and self-narration
【24h】

Advance Directives: regarding the recovery of subjectivity between independence and self-narration

机译:预先指示:关于恢复独立和自我叙述之间的主观性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

After 41 years from the approval of the first living will law in 1976 in California, on December 22nd 2017 the bill on “Rules on in- formed consent and advance directives” has been approved in Italy. The applicability of the law highlights a lack of a univocal methodol- ogy regarding the recovery process of the patient’s subjective dimension under a testamentary will; so, it seemed useful to highlight the passages that occur between the drafting and the use of an advance directive in an existential phenomenological prospective. Is the individual who freely drafts an A.D., choosing to decide now for the future, the same per- son for which the provisions were outlined? The goal of this paper is to offer an ethical reading of the ontological issue that illness can raises.
机译:自1976年在加利福尼亚通过第一份遗嘱法律以来已有41年,2017年12月22日,意大利通过了关于“知情同意和预先指示规则”的法案。该法律的适用性突出表明,在遗嘱遗嘱下,缺乏关于患者主观维度恢复过程的明确方法论;因此,在存在的现象学前景中突出显示起草和使用预先指示之间发生的段落似乎很有用。是否可以自由起草A.D.的个人,选择现在为将来做决定,是否与规定的大纲相同?本文的目的是对疾病可能引起的本体论问题提供符合道德的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号