首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Service Science and Management >Owning Faculty Status: A Manifesto
【24h】

Owning Faculty Status: A Manifesto

机译:所属教师身份:宣言

获取原文
       

摘要

Since the first moment librarians were granted tenured faculty status in the academic arena, questions have been raised by university and library administration, faculty members in other departments, and non-academics as to why they were given the opportunity to achieve such a prestigious rank. Not only did the majority of tenured/tenure track faculty librarians not have the standard doctorate degree possessed by most other tenured/tenure track faculty, but there were also questions surrounding the librarians’ purported lack of teaching and their ability to perform original research as required for those tenure and promotion standards set by the academic institution. Sadly, this perception is due not only to incorrect external opinions about what academic librarians do and how they serve their profession but also to various internal library misunderstandings of what it means to be a tenured/tenure track faculty member. As a result of this misunderstanding, some librarians are unable to communicate what it means to be a librarian with tenured faculty status and thus the importance of academic freedom for their profession as a whole. This paper describes some key challenges tenured/tenure track faculty librarians face within their academic institutions as they attempt to grapple with what it means to be a librarian with tenured/tenure track status.
机译:自从图书馆员在学术界被授予终身教职以来,大学和图书馆管理部门,其他部门的教职人员以及非学术界就为何赋予他们获得这样的名望职称提出了疑问。大多数终身制/终身制教师的图书馆员不具有大多数其他终身制/终身制教师所拥有的标准博士学位,而且围绕着图书馆员自称缺乏教学以及他们按要求进行原创研究的能力也存在一些问题。该学术机构设定的任期和晋升标准。令人遗憾的是,这种理解不仅是由于对学术图书馆员的行为及其服务方式的不正确的外部意见,而且还归因于内部图书馆对终身任职/终身任职教师的含义的各种误解。由于这种误解,一些图书馆员无法传达担任终身教职的图书馆员的含义,因此学术自由对于他们整个职业的重要性。本文描述了终身/终身制图书馆员在其学术机构中试图应对成为终身/终身制图书馆员的意义时面临的一些关键挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号