首页> 外文期刊>Journal of postgraduate medicine. >Outcomes of a conservative approach to management in amoebic liver abscess
【24h】

Outcomes of a conservative approach to management in amoebic liver abscess

机译:保守治疗阿米巴肝脓肿的方法的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: Unfortunately, there is confusion among the medical community regarding the management of amoebic liver abscess (ALA). Therapeutic options range from simple pharmacotherapy to use of interventions like a needle or catheter aspiration under ultrasound guidance to surgical intervention. There is a plethora of thresholds for parameters such as the maximum diameter of the abscess and volume on ultrasound examination suggested by various authors to serve as a criterion to help to decide when to use which modality in these cases. Aims: To assess the outcome of patients with uncomplicated ALA treated using a conservative approach. Moreover, to identify factors associated with its failure. Settings and Design: A prospective, observational study was carried out at a large municipal urban health care center over a period of 3-year (2011-2014) in India. Materials and Methods: Patients with uncomplicated ALA were recruited. All patients were managed with pharmacotherapy initially for a period of 72 h. Response to treatment was assessed by resolution of symptoms within the given time frame. Failure to respond was considered an indication for intervention. Needle aspiration was offered to these patients and response assessed within 72 h. Failure to respond to aspiration was considered an indication for catheter drainage. Statistical Analysis Used: Data recorded were entered in a Microsoft Office Excel Sheet and analyzed using the SPSS version 16.0 (IBM). Results: Sixty patients with ALA were included in the study over its duration. Forty-nine (81.67%) patients were managed conservatively, while 11 (18.33%) patients needed an intervention for relief. Patients who required intervention had deranged liver function at presentation, a larger abscess diameter (10.09 ± 2.23 vs. 6.33 ± 1.69 cm P P P post hoc analysis, a maximum diameter of >7.7 cm was found to be the optimal criterion to predict the need of intervention in cases of ALA. Conclusions: A conservative approach is effective in the management of ALA for a majority of patients. Failure of conservative management was predicted by the size of the abscess (maximum diameter >7.7 cm). Even in the cases of failure, a gradual step-up with interventions was found to be safe and effective.
机译:背景:不幸的是,医学界对阿米巴肝脓肿(ALA)的治疗存在困惑。治疗选择的范围从简单的药物治疗到在超声引导下使用针或导管抽吸等干预措施到手术干预措施不等。各种作者提出的参数阈值过多,例如脓肿的最大直径和超声检查的体积,这些阈值可作为确定这些情况下何时使用哪种方式的标准。目的:评估使用保守方法治疗单纯性ALA的患者的预后。而且,要确定与其故障相关的因素。设置和设计:在印度的一个大型市政医疗中心进行了为期3年(2011-2014年)的前瞻性观察研究。材料和方法:招募患有简单ALA的患者。最初所有患者均接受药物治疗72小时。通过在给定的时间内缓解症状来评估对治疗的反应。没有反应被认为是干预的迹象。为这些患者提供了针吸术,并在72小时内评估了反应。对抽吸失败的反应被认为是导管引流的指征。使用的统计分析:记录的数据输入到Microsoft Office Excel表格中,并使用SPSS 16.0版(IBM)进行分析。结果:60名ALA患者在研究期间被纳入研究。保守治疗49例(81.67%),而需要干预的患者11例(18.33%)。需要干预的患者出现肝功能异常时,脓肿直径较大(10.09±2.23 vs. 6.33±1.69 cm PPP事后分析,发现最大直径> 7.7 cm是预测需要干预的最佳标准结论:对于大多数患者,保守治疗可有效治疗ALA,脓肿的大小(最大直径> 7.7 cm)可预测保守治疗的失败,即使在失败的情况下,发现逐步采取干预措施是安全有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号