...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development >Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg? and Mauch SNS? prosthetic knees
【24h】

Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg? and Mauch SNS? prosthetic knees

机译:使用C-Leg?的经股截肢步态的运动学和动力学比较和Mauch SNS?假肢

获取原文

摘要

The C-Leg? (Otto Bock, Duderstadt, Germany) is a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee that may enhance amputee gait. This intrasubject randomized study compared the gait biomechanics of transfemoral amputees wearing the C-Leg? with those wearing a common noncomputerized prosthesis, the Mauch SNS? (Ossur, Reykjavik, Iceland). After subjects had a 3-month acclimation period with each prosthetic knee, typical gait biomechanical data were collected in a gait laboratory. At a controlled walking speed (CWS), peak swing phase knee-flexion angle decreased for the C-Leg? group compared with the Mauch SNS? group (55.2° ± 6.5° vs 64.41° ± 5.8°, respectively; p = 0.005); the C-Leg? group was similar to control subjects' peak swing knee-flexion angle (56.0° ± 3.4°). Stance knee-flexion moment increased for the C-Leg? group compared with the Mauch SNS? group (0.142 ± 0.05 vs 0.067 ± 0.07 N2m, respectively; p = 0.01), but remained significantly reduced compared with control subjects (0.477 ± 0.1 N2m). Prosthetic limb step length at CWS was less for the C-Leg? group compared with the Mauch SNS? group (0.66 ± 0.04 vs 0.70 ± 0.06 m, respectively; p = 0.005), which resulted in increased symmetry between limbs for the C-Leg? group. Subjects also walked faster with the C-Leg? versus the Mauch SNS? (1.30 ± 0.1 vs 1.21 ± 0.1 m/s, respectively; p = 0.004). The C-Leg? prosthetic limb vertical ground reaction force decreased compared with the Mauch SNS? (96.3 ± 4.7 vs 100.3 ± 7.5 % body weight, respectively; p = 0.0092).
机译:C腿? (Otto Bock,德国Duderstadt)是一种微处理器控制的假肢膝盖,可增强截肢者的步态。这项受试者内部随机研究比较了穿C腿的经股截肢者的步态生物力学。那些穿着普通的非计算机假体的人,莫赫(Mauch)SNS? (Ossur,雷克雅未克,冰岛)。在受试者对每个假肢进行3个月的适应训练后,在步态实验室中收集典型的步态生物力学数据。在控制的步行速度(CWS)下,C腿的最大摆动相位膝屈角减小。小组与Mauch SNS相比?组(分别为55.2°±6.5°和64.41°±5.8°; p = 0.005); C腿?组与对照组受试者的最大挥膝屈曲角度(56.0°±3.4°)相似。 C型腿的站立姿势屈膝力矩增加了吗?小组与Mauch SNS相比?组(分别为0.142±0.05和0.067±0.07 N2m; p = 0.01),但与对照组(0.477±0.1 N2m)相比仍显着降低。对于C-Leg,在CWS处假肢的步长要短一些?小组与Mauch SNS相比?组(分别为0.66±0.04和0.70±0.06 m; p = 0.005),这导致C型腿肢的四肢对称性增加。组。受试者使用C型腿走得更快?与Mauch SNS? (分别为1.30±0.1与1.21±0.1 m / s; p = 0.004)。 C腿?假肢垂直地面反作用力与Mauch SNS相比有所降低? (分别为96.3±4.7和100.3±7.5%体重; p = 0.0092)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号