...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews >An Interdisciplinary Process Change: Conversion of PICC Line Capping Solution From Heparin to Normal Saline
【24h】

An Interdisciplinary Process Change: Conversion of PICC Line Capping Solution From Heparin to Normal Saline

机译:跨学科的过程变化:将PICC线型封端液从肝素转化为生理盐水

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and HIT with thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) are serious conditions. Patients are at increased risk for developing HIT/HITTS with any exposure to heparin, even intravenous line flushes. Patients may be exposed to heparin multiple times each day when they have a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) that is flushed and capped with heparin. At Aurora Health Care, heparin is the standard capping solution for PICCs, but with a recent switch to positive pressurized caps, normal saline may be a capping option that reduces patient exposure to heparin. Purpose: To reduce heparin exposure at a single hospital by replacing heparin with normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) as the standard PICC capping solution. Methods: We implemented an interdisciplinary pilot process change and evaluated whether normal saline was noninferior to heparin for maintaining PICC patency. Primary outcome measurements of patency include alteplase use due to occlusion. Secondary objectives were any change in invasive line infection rates and cost comparisons. The baseline patency rate for the hospital was derived from data extracted through a retrospective chart review from October 2013 through October 2014. Results: Our baseline patency rate was 65.42% (N = 3,095); 33% of all PICC lines placed during the 12-month period were treated with alteplase. Patency rates during our pilot period were based on retrospective chart reviews of patients with PICC lines placed from February to May 2015. During this period, a total of 979 PICC lines were evaluated. Of these, 30.4% were treated with alteplase. This resulted in a pilot patency rate of 69.5%, which is 4.1% greater than our baseline patency rate. Given the prespecified noninferiority margin of 5%, our pilot demonstrates that normal saline is noninferior to heparin for maintaining PICC line patency when used with positive pressurized caps (α < 0.05). Although number of infections increased 16%, only 9% with line infections were part of our pilot. The estimated yearly cost of both capping solutions is equal, at approximately $3,960 per our baseline usage data. By potentially avoiding a diagnosis of HIT/HITT in these patients, the hospital would realize an annualized savings of over $86,000. Conclusion: Normal saline has demonstrated historical noninferiority to heparin for maintaining PICC patency when used as the capping solution with positive pressurized caps. Similar results were found during our pilot.
机译:背景:肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)和伴有血栓形成综合征的HIT(HITTS)是严重的疾病。暴露于肝素,甚至静脉冲洗都会使患者发生HIT / HITTS的风险增加。当患者的外围插入的中心导管(PICC)冲洗并盖上肝素后,每天可能会多次接触肝素。在Aurora Health Care中,肝素是PICC的标准加盖溶液,但是随着最近转向正压盖的使用,生理盐水可能是减少患者接触肝素的加盖方法。目的:通过用生理盐水(0.9%氯化钠)代替肝素作为标准PICC封盖溶液,减少一家医院的肝素暴露。方法:我们进行了跨学科的试验过程变更,并评估了生理盐水是否不劣于肝素以维持PICC的通畅性。通畅性的主要结局指标包括因闭塞而使用阿替普酶。次要目标是侵入性线感染率和成本比较的任何变化。该医院的基线通畅率来自2013年10月至2014年10月通过回顾性图表审查提取的数据。结果:我们的基线通畅率为65.42%(N = 3,095);在12个月内放置的所有PICC品系中,有33%用阿替普酶治疗。我们的试点期间的通畅率基于对2015年2月至2015年5月放置的PICC线患者的回顾性图表审查。在此期间,总共评估了979条PICC线。其中30.4%用阿替普酶治疗。这导致试点通畅率为69.5%,比我们的基线通畅率高4.1%。考虑到预先规定的5%的非劣效性,我们的飞行员证明,与正压帽配合使用时,生理盐水不劣于肝素可保持PICC线通畅(α<0.05)。尽管感染数量增加了16%,但只有9%的线感染是我们试验的一部分。两种封顶解决方案的估计年度费用相等,根据我们的基准使用数据,大约为3,960美元。通过潜在地避免对这些患者进行HIT / HITT的诊断,该医院每年将节省超过$ 86,000。结论:当用作正压帽的加盖溶液时,生理盐水已证明在维持PICC通畅方面不逊于肝素。在我们的试点期间发现了类似的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号