...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering >Telecare – where, when, why and for whom does it work? A realist evaluation of a Norwegian project:
【24h】

Telecare – where, when, why and for whom does it work? A realist evaluation of a Norwegian project:

机译:远程护理–在哪里,何时,为什么以及为谁工作?挪威项目的现实评估:

获取原文

摘要

IntroductionEvaluations of telecare demonstrate disparate results, which are of little help for understanding what the users need from further policy and development. This study aims to provide a more nuanced approach to telecare evaluations.MethodsRealist evaluation is used to scrutinize what it is about telecare that works for whom, why, how and in which circumstances. Sequential interviews were conducted with telecare users and relatives at pre- and post-implementation stages.ResultSome users experienced the intended effects from telecare, such as increased feeling of safety, whereas others did not. Various contextual elements influenced how people reasoned about the resources provided by telecare and affected the individual outcomes.DiscussionThe desire to remain in own home appeared to be a major driving force in accepting telecare. Users had surprisingly high tolerance to side effects of telecare, which might indicate that much was at stake. Some users disapproved of having telecare due to contextua...
机译:简介远程医疗的评估显示出截然不同的结果,对于了解用户从进一步的政策和发展中需要什么几乎没有帮助。这项研究旨在为远程医疗评估提供一种更加细致入微的方法。方法现实主义评估用于审查远程医疗的意义,该远程医疗适用于谁,为什么,如何以及在什么情况下使用。在实施前后,对远程护理用户和亲戚进行了顺序访谈。结果有些用户体验了远程护理的预期效果,例如增加了安全感,而其他用户则没有。各种上下文因素影响了人们对远程医疗提供的资源的推理方式,并影响了个人的结果。讨论留在自己家里的愿望似乎是接受远程医疗的主要推动力。用户对远程医疗的副作用具有出乎意料的高耐受性,这可能表明存在很多风险。由于上下文原因,一些用户不赞成使用远程医疗服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号