首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews >Family Practice Resident Expectations by Year From Faculty and Resident Perspectives: A Quality Improvement Initiative
【24h】

Family Practice Resident Expectations by Year From Faculty and Resident Perspectives: A Quality Improvement Initiative

机译:从教职人员和居民的角度来看,家庭实践居民的年度期望:质量改进计划

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The transition from student to physician requires substantial commitment and work from residents as well as guidance from program faculty. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has standardized certain academic requirements for U.S. residency programs; however, faculty expectations of residents according to year in the program are less formal and more a hidden curriculum. Setting expectations for residents to consult could better help residents navigate their graduate medical education experience and achieve the level of excellence expected by ACGME. Purpose: Our quality improvement study aimed to: 1) determine what the expectations of family practice residents were based on feedback from faculty members and current residents; and 2) share these expectations with residents. Methods: A preintervention survey was emailed to family medicine program faculty and residents regarding resident expectations according to year in the program. Based on the results of the preintervention survey, expectations were outlined in a handout according to year in the program and were presented to current residents during scheduled didactic time. Residents who responded to the preintervention survey were then asked to respond to the postintervention survey. Fisher exact tests were used to compare preand postintervention survey responses. Results: Overall, 64% (14 of 22) of faculty and 64% (18 of 28) of residents responded to the preintervention survey. While 79% of faculty expressed that they had specific expectations for residents, 77% felt that residents did not know these expectations. Additionally, while residents (94%) believed faculty had expectations of them, only 33% knew what the expectations were. Following intervention, 15 of 18 residents responded, with 79% now reporting they knew what the expectations were (P = 0.02). The handout was found useful by all those queried, and 85% felt it clarified expectations. Conclusion: At baseline, residents and faculty knew there were expectations for residents as they progress through the program, but those expectations were not explicit. Despite the lack of vertical communication, the expectations from both groups were surprisingly similar. A handout delivered electronically and at didactic sessions was deemed useful and clarified expectations.
机译:背景:从学生到医生的过渡需要居民的大力投入和工作,以及计划教师的指导。研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)已对美国居住计划的某些学术要求进行了标准化;但是,该计划中居民对教师的期望并不那么正式,而更多是隐性课程。设定居民咨询的期望可以更好地帮助居民导航其研究生医学教育经验,并达到ACGME期望的卓越水平。目的:我们的质量改进研究旨在:1)根据教师和当前居民的反馈,确定对家庭执业居民的期望是什么; 2)与居民分享这些期望。方法:将干预前的调查通过电子邮件发送给家庭医学计划的教职员工和居民,以根据计划中的年份对居民的期望进行调查。根据干预前调查的结果,根据计划中的年份在讲义中概述了期望,并在预定的授课时间内向当前居民提出了期望。然后要求对干预前调查做出回应的居民对干预后调查作出回应。 Fisher精确检验用于比较干预前后的调查答复。结果:总体而言,干预前调查对64%的教师(22名中的14名)和64%(28名中的18名)的居民做出了回应。尽管79%的教师表示他们对居民有特定的期望,但77%的教师认为居民不知道这些期望。此外,虽然居民(94%)认为教师对他们有期望,但只有33%的人知道期望是什么。干预后,18位居民中有15位做出了回应,现在有79%的居民报告说他们知道他们的期望是什么(P = 0.02)。所查询的所有人员均发现该讲义有用,并且85%的人认为这澄清了期望。结论:在基线时,居民和教职员工都知道他们在整个计划过程中对他们抱有期望,但这些期望并不明确。尽管缺乏垂直沟通,但两组的期望却惊人地相似。以电子方式和在教学会议上分发的讲义被认为是有用的,并澄清了期望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号