首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences >The comparison of frictional resistance in titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and stainless steel brackets using stainless steel and TMA archwires: An in vitro study
【24h】

The comparison of frictional resistance in titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and stainless steel brackets using stainless steel and TMA archwires: An in vitro study

机译:钛,自结扎不锈钢和使用不锈钢和TMA弓丝的不锈钢支架的摩擦阻力比较:一项体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim:The aim of the study was to compare the frictional resistance of titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and conventional stainless steel brackets, using stainless steel and titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) archwires.Materials and Methods:We compared the frictional resistance in 0.018 slot and 0.022 slot of the three brackets – titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and conventional stainless steel – using stainless steel archwires and TMA archwires. An in vitro study of simulated canine retraction was undertaken to evaluate the difference in frictional resistance between titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and stainless steel brackets, using stainless steel and TMA archwires.Results and Conclusion:We compared the frictional resistance of titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and conventional stainless steel brackets, using stainless steel and TMA archwires, with the help of Instron Universal Testing Machine. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Student's “t” test, and post hoc multiple range test at level of <0.05 showed statistically significant difference in the mean values of all groups. Results demonstrated that the titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and stainless steel brackets of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot had no significant variations in frictional résistance. The self-ligating bracket with TMA archwires showed relatively less frictional resistance compared with the other groups. The titanium bracket with TMA archwires showed relatively less frictional resistance compared with the stainless steel brackets.
机译:目的:研究的目的是使用不锈钢和钛钼合金(TMA)弓丝比较钛,自结扎不锈钢和常规不锈钢托板的摩擦阻力。材料与方法:使用不锈钢弓丝和TMA弓丝,三个支架的0.018槽和0.022槽–钛,自结扎不锈钢和常规不锈钢。使用不锈钢和TMA弓丝进行了模拟犬牙回缩的体外研究,以评估钛,自锁紧不锈钢和不锈钢托架之间的摩擦阻力差异。结果与结论:我们比较了钛的摩擦阻力,在Instron万能试验机的帮助下,使用不锈钢和TMA弓丝自结扎的不锈钢和传统的不锈钢支架。单向方差分析(ANOVA),Student的“ t”检验和事后多范围检验(水平<0.05)显示,所有组的平均值均具有统计学上的显着差异。结果表明,钛,自绑扎不锈钢和0.018英寸和0.022英寸槽的不锈钢支架的摩擦阻力没有明显变化。与其他组相比,带有TMA弓丝的自结扎支架显示出相对较小的摩擦阻力。与不锈钢支架相比,带有TMA弓丝的钛支架显示出相对较小的摩擦阻力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号