...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice >Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency
【24h】

Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch regulatory summaries from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency

机译:美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局的羟乙基淀粉法规摘要的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This article aims to highlight the positions of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency regarding use and marketing of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) products, and how these have changed over recent years. In 2013, warnings from both agencies advised against use of HES in critically ill patients, including patients with sepsis, when several large randomized controlled trials on volume resuscitation in critical illness failed to observe clinically beneficial effects of HES. In areas such as patient monitoring and requirements for further clinical trials, the FDA and EMA are very much in agreement in their recommendations. However, EMA guidance is generally more restrictive on HES usage compared to that from the FDA. Differences in data presented to regulatory authorities, bias in study results and inherent weakness of meta-analyses used for drug surveillance purposes, plus different risk-management approaches used by the two regulatory authorities, likely contribute to different outcomes in their regulations concerning use of HES.
机译:本文旨在重点介绍食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局在使用和销售羟乙基淀粉(HES)产品方面的立场,以及近年来这些方面的变化。 2013年,两家机构的警告均建议不要在危重患者(包括败血症患者)中使用HES,因为几项关于危重病患者复苏的大型随机对照试验均未观察到HES的临床有益效果。在诸如患者监测和进一步临床试验要求等领域,FDA和EMA的建议非常一致。但是,与FDA相比,EMA指南通常对HES的使用更为严格。向监管机构提供的数据的差异,研究结果的偏倚以及用于药物监视目的的荟萃分析的固有缺陷,再加上两个监管机构使用的风险管理方法不同,可能会导致其关于使用HES的法规产生不同的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号