首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
【24h】

Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study

机译:与非特定说明相比,面向目标的说明增加了中风康复的练习强度:参与者内部,重复测量的实验研究

获取原文
           

摘要

QuestionsIn stroke rehabilitation, do goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice during therapy compared to a non-specific instruction? Is one type of goal-oriented instruction more effective at increasing the intensity of practice achieved by stroke survivors during therapy?DesignA within-participant, repeated measures experimental study.ParticipantsTwenty-four adults undertaking stroke rehabilitation at a metropolitan hospital as an inpatient or outpatient.InterventionParticipants were observed performing exercises across 3 days. On each day, they performed an exercise with a non-specific instruction (‘do some [exercise]’) as a baseline measure and the same exercise with one of three goal-oriented instructions, delivered in a randomised order. The three goal-oriented instructions were: ‘do [exercise] 25 times’ (instruction A), ‘do [exercise] 25 times as fast as you can’ (instruction B), and ‘do [exercise] 25 times, as fast as you can, aiming for a personal best’ (instruction C). The last instruction included verbal encouragement during the exercise.Outcome measuresThe time taken to complete 25 repetitions under the baseline condition and each instruction was recorded and converted into repetitions per minute.ResultsAll of the goal-oriented instructions resulted in a significant increase in the rate of repetitions of the exercise being performed compared to the baseline measure: percentage increase from baseline (95% CI) was 62% (31 to 93) with instruction A, 116% (67 to 165) with instruction B, and 128% (84 to 171) with instruction C. Instruction C had a significantly greater effect than instruction A: mean difference in percentage increase 65% (95% CI 13 to 118).ConclusionGoal-oriented instructions can result in significant increases in the rate of repetitions of exercise in stroke rehabilitation. The use of goal-oriented instructions is a simple, no-cost strategy that can be used to increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation.Trial registrationACTRN12619000146190.
机译:问题在中风康复中,与非特定指导相比,面向目标的指导是否增加了治疗过程中的练习强度?一种以目标为导向的教学方法在提高中风幸存者在治疗过程中所获得的练习强度上是否更有效?DesignA参加者内部重复性实验研究。参与者二十四名成年人在大城市医院接受住院或门诊治疗。干预观察到参与者进行了为期3天的锻炼。每天,他们都以一个非特定的指令(“做一些[运动]”)作为基准测量来进行练习,并以三个面向目标的指令之一进行相同的练习,以随机顺序进行。三个面向目标的指令是:“做[运动] 25次”(指令A),“做[运动] 25倍快”(指令B)和“做[运动] 25倍快”。力求达到个人最好的目标”(说明C)。最后一条指导包括在锻炼过程中的口头鼓励。结果测量在基线条件下完成25次重复所花费的时间,每条指导被记录并转换为每分钟重复。结果所有以目标为导向的指导显着提高了锻炼的速度。与基线测量值相比,重复进行的锻炼:相对于基线(95%CI)的百分比增加是A指令为62%(31至93),B指令为116%(67至165)和128%(84至84%)。 171)与C指令相比,C指令的效果明显优于A指令:百分比差异的平均百分比提高了65%(95%CI 13至118)。结论面向目标的指令可能会导致C的重复运动率显着提高。中风康复。使用面向目标的指令是一种简单的,免费的策略,可用于增加中风康复实践的强度。尝试注册ACTRN12619000146190。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号