...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Research >Delayed drainage versus autotransfusion drainage and routine drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study
【24h】

Delayed drainage versus autotransfusion drainage and routine drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study

机译:全膝关节置换术后延迟引流与自体输血和常规引流的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The purpose of this research is to compare the clinical results of different drainage methods in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods This retrospective comparative study included 55 patients who accepted primary unilateral TKA between October 2010 and November 2012. The patients were classified according to the drainage method used: 25 patients in the autotransfusion drainage group, 12 patients in the delayed drainage group, and 18 patients in the routine drainage group. Otherwise, the same operative procedures and postoperative care were applied to all patients. The variables recorded included total amount of postoperative drainage (including intraoperative blood loss); cases of allogenic blood transfusion; body temperatures on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7; and pre- and postoperative hemoglobin level. Some other elements such as postoperative swelling, range of motion, and wound healing were also compared. Results Patients who underwent autotransfusion were found to have an amount of drainage (799.2 ± 196.7 mL) significantly greater than that in the routine drainage group (666.1 ± 155.0 mL), which in turn was significantly greater than that in the delayed drainage group (381.7 ± 129.2 mL). The postoperative hemoglobin level in the delayed drainage group (91.5 ± 7.9 g/L) was similar to that in the autotransfusion group (92.0 ± 9.6 g/L), while that in the routine drainage group (81.3 ± 9.9 g/L) was significantly lower. The patients in the autotransfusion group were observed to have higher body temperatures than those in the other two groups. In the routine drainage group, eight cases accepted allogenic blood transfusion, and the percentage (44.4%) was significantly higher than that in the other two groups. There were no significant between-group differences in swelling, healing qualities, and range of motion. Conclusions Delayed postoperative drainage may reduce blood loss and the chance of allogenic blood transfusion compared with routine drainage and may also reduce the chance of postoperative fever and extra costs compared with autotransfusion.
机译:背景技术这项研究的目的是比较全膝关节置换术(TKA)中不同引流方法的临床效果。方法这项回顾性比较研究包括55例在2010年10月至2012年11月期间接受原发性单侧TKA的患者。根据使用的引流方法对患者进行分类:自体输血引流组25例,延迟引流组12例,18例在常规引流组中。否则,对所有患者采用相同的手术程序和术后护理。记录的变量包括术后引流总量(包括术中失血);异体输血的情况;术后第1、3和7天的体温;以及手术前后的血红蛋白水平。还比较了其他一些因素,例如术后肿胀,运动范围和伤口愈合。结果发现自体输血患者的引流量(799.2±196.7 mL)显着大于常规引流组(666.1±155.0 mL),而引流量则明显大于延迟引流组(381.7) ±129.2 mL)。延迟引流组的术后血红蛋白水平(91.5±7.9 g / L)与自体输血组(92.0±9.6 g / L)相似,而常规引流组(81.3±9.9 g / L)大大降低。观察到自体输血组的患者体温高于其他两组。常规引流组有8例接受了同种异体输血,百分比(44.4%)明显高于其他两组。肿胀,愈合质量和运动范围在组间没有显着差异。结论与常规引流相比,术后延迟引流可减少失血量和异体输血的机会,与自体输血相比,还可减少术后发烧的机会和额外费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号