首页> 外文期刊>Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = >Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR): a comparative study between powered and non-powered technique
【24h】

Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR): a comparative study between powered and non-powered technique

机译:内窥镜泪囊鼻腔吻合术(DCR):动力技术与非动力技术的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR) is an operation used to treat nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Essentially there are two approaches: external and endoscopic. Several modalities are used in endoscopic DCR; all aiming to improve success rate, reduce complications, and shorten operative time. Both kerrison punch and drill are widely used in endoscopic DCR with non-conclusive knowledge about differences in operative details as well as on the outcome. The aim of this study is to compare between powered (drill) and non-powered (kerrison punch) DCR to clarify the superiority of one over the other. A retrospective chart review of 59 patients who underwent endoscopic DCR procedure at our institution from June 2013 until July 2014 (34 kerrison punch and 32 powered drill). Operative details, surgical outcome and complications were compared between both groups. A total of 66 endoscopic DCRs were performed on 59 patients. Procedure success rate among kerrison punch group was 87.88?% vs. 90.9?% in powered drill group (p?=?0.827), while complications for both groups were statistical not significant (p?=?0.91). The mean operating time among kerrison punch group was significantly lower than in powered drill group (75?min vs. 125?min, p?=?0.0001). Kerrison punch showed significant reduction in operating time when compared to powered drill for endoscopic DCR. No statistically significant difference was found between both groups regarding procedures’ success rate and complication.
机译:泪囊鼻腔吻合术(DCR)是一种用于治疗鼻泪管阻塞的手术。本质上有两种方法:外部和内窥镜检查。内窥镜DCR中使用了几种模式。所有这些旨在提高成功率,减少并发症并缩短手术时间。钻床打孔机和钻床都广泛用于内窥镜DCR中,但尚无关于操作细节和结果差异的非结论性知识。这项研究的目的是比较动力(钻孔)和非动力(立式冲床)DCR之间的差异,以阐明两者之间的优越性。回顾性回顾性研究,回顾性分析了2013年6月至2014年7月在我院接受内窥镜DCR手术的59例患者(34具卡里森冲头和32具动力钻头)。比较两组的手术细节,手术结果和并发症。 59例患者共进行了66例内镜DCR。弯头拳组的手术成功率为87.88%,动力钻组为90.9%(p = 0.827),两组的并发症均无统计学意义(p = 0.91)。夹头打孔器组的平均操作时间显着低于动力钻头组(75分钟对125分钟,p = 0.0001)。与用于内窥镜DCR的动力钻相比,Kerrison冲头显示出显着减少的操作时间。两组在手术成功率和并发症方面均无统计学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号